On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:20:55 +0200, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> Hi all,
> please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
> can be called from the kernel.
>
> This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
> permits kernel to do GPIO set-up during boot
On Fri, 5 Oct 2012 14:20:55 +0200, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
can be called from the kernel.
This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
permits kernel to do GPIO
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> [Me]
>> So can you explain exactly why userspace want to configure
>> GPIO pins in interrupt mode, when there is no way whatsoever
>> for userspace to handle these IRQs?
>
> Maybe I understand something wrong, but explicit configuration of
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
[Me]
So can you explain exactly why userspace want to configure
GPIO pins in interrupt mode, when there is no way whatsoever
for userspace to handle these IRQs?
Maybe I understand something wrong, but explicit
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
> wrote:
>> [Me]
>>> If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
>>> struct irq_chip to userspace,
>>> trying to hide it by instead exposing a property of the
>>> containing
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:00:34PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
> wrote:
> > [Me]
> >> If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
> >> struct irq_chip to userspace,
> >> trying to hide it by instead exposing a property of the
> >>
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> [Me]
>> If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
>> struct irq_chip to userspace,
>> trying to hide it by instead exposing a property of the
>> containing struct gpio_chip and it worries me.
>
> No, it should not.
You are
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
[Me]
If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
struct irq_chip to userspace,
trying to hide it by instead exposing a property of the
containing struct gpio_chip and it worries me.
No, it should
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 02:00:34PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
[Me]
If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
struct irq_chip to userspace,
trying to hide it by instead exposing a property
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 2:00 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
[Me]
If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
struct irq_chip to userspace,
trying to hide it by instead exposing a
Hi Grant, Thomas,
do you see any potential problems with this patch?
It adds sysfs interface to change / set-up trigger edge from the
kernel (currently not possible).
BR,
Drasko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Linus Walleij
> wrote:
Hi Grant, Thomas,
do you see any potential problems with this patch?
It adds sysfs interface to change / set-up trigger edge from the
kernel (currently not possible).
BR,
Drasko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM,
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
> Why not put the above text into the patch commit blurb?
OK, I can add this easily. Makes sense.
> If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
> struct irq_chip to userspace,
>
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
> can be called from the kernel.
>
> This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
> permits kernel to do GPIO set-up during boot stage.
Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Drasko DRASKOVIC
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:59:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH][GPIO] Add IRQ edge setter to gpiolib Signed-off-by:
Drasko DRASKOVIC
---
Documentation/gpio.txt |3 ++
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c |
Hi Mark,
thanks.
I'll re-send it as a plain text in a separate e-mail.
BR,
Drasko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Mark Brown
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:09:13PM +0200, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
>> Looping GPIO maintainers...
>
> Please follow the patch submission process in
>
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:09:13PM +0200, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
> Looping GPIO maintainers...
Please follow the patch submission process in
Documentation/SubmittingPatches - the main thing here is to not send the
patch as an attachment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
Looping GPIO maintainers...
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
wrote:
> Hi all,
> please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
> can be called from the kernel.
>
> This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
> permits kernel to do
Hi all,
please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
can be called from the kernel.
This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
permits kernel to do GPIO set-up during boot stage. Configuration
which defines pins behavior is often kept in NVRAM, and
Hi all,
please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
can be called from the kernel.
This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
permits kernel to do GPIO set-up during boot stage. Configuration
which defines pins behavior is often kept in NVRAM, and
Looping GPIO maintainers...
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 12:45 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
can be called from the kernel.
This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:09:13PM +0200, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
Looping GPIO maintainers...
Please follow the patch submission process in
Documentation/SubmittingPatches - the main thing here is to not send the
patch as an attachment.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Hi Mark,
thanks.
I'll re-send it as a plain text in a separate e-mail.
BR,
Drasko
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:50 PM, Mark Brown
broo...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 01:09:13PM +0200, Drasko DRASKOVIC wrote:
Looping GPIO maintainers...
Please follow the patch
00:00:00 2001
From: Drasko DRASKOVIC drasko.drasko...@gmail.com
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2012 11:59:47 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH][GPIO] Add IRQ edge setter to gpiolib Signed-off-by:
Drasko DRASKOVIC drasko.drasko...@gmail.com
---
Documentation/gpio.txt |3 ++
drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
drasko.drasko...@gmail.com wrote:
please find a patch that adds IRQ edge set-up mechanism to sysfs that
can be called from the kernel.
This functionality can be very useful for embedded systems, as it
permits kernel to do GPIO set-up during
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Linus Walleij linus.wall...@linaro.org wrote:
On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Drasko DRASKOVIC
Why not put the above text into the patch commit blurb?
OK, I can add this easily. Makes sense.
If I understand correctly the below more or less exports
struct
26 matches
Mail list logo
