Re: [PATCH][next] KEYS: trusted: Fix missing null return from kzalloc call

2021-04-14 Thread Jarkko Sakkinen
On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 05:01:01PM +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King 
> 
> The kzalloc call can return null with the GFP_KERNEL flag so
> add a null check and exit via a new error exit label. Use the
> same exit error label for another error path too.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
> Fixes: 830027e2cb55 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
 
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen 

/Jarkko


Re: [PATCH][next] KEYS: trusted: Fix missing null return from kzalloc call

2021-04-12 Thread Sumit Garg
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 22:34, Colin Ian King  wrote:
>
> On 12/04/2021 17:48, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:01 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> >> From: Colin Ian King 
> >>
> >> The kzalloc call can return null with the GFP_KERNEL flag so
> >> add a null check and exit via a new error exit label. Use the
> >> same exit error label for another error path too.
> >>
> >> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
> >> Fixes: 830027e2cb55 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys
> >> framework")
> >> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
> >> ---
> >>  security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 6 --
> >>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> >> b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> >> index ec3a066a4b42..90774793f0b1 100644
> >> --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> >> +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> >> @@ -116,11 +116,13 @@ static struct trusted_key_payload
> >> *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key *key)
> >>
> >>  ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
> >>  if (ret < 0)
> >> -return p;
> >> +goto err;
> >>  p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> >> +if (!p)
> >> +goto err;
> >>
> >>  p->migratable = migratable;
> >> -
> >> +err:
> >>  return p;
> >
> > This is clearly a code migration bug in
> >
> > commit 251c85bd106099e6f388a89e88e12d14de2c9cda
> > Author: Sumit Garg 
> > Date:   Mon Mar 1 18:41:24 2021 +0530
> >
> > KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework
> >
> > Which has for addition to trusted_core.c:
> >
> > +static struct trusted_key_payload *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key
> > *key)
> > +{
> > +   struct trusted_key_payload *p = NULL;
> > +   int ret;
> > +
> > +   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
> > +   if (ret < 0)
> > +   return p;
> > +   p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> > +
> > +   p->migratable = migratable;
> > +
> > +   return p;
> > +}
> >
> > And for trusted_tpm1.c:
> >
> > -static struct trusted_key_payload *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key
> > *key)
> > -{
> > -   struct trusted_key_payload *p = NULL;
> > -   int ret;
> > -
> > -   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof *p);
> > -   if (ret < 0)
> > -   return p;
> > -   p = kzalloc(sizeof *p, GFP_KERNEL);
> > -   if (p)
> > -   p->migratable = 1; /* migratable by default */
> > -   return p;
> > -}
> >
> > The trusted_tpm1.c code was correct and we got this bug introduced by
> > what should have been a simple cut and paste ... how did that happen?

It was a little more than just cut and paste where I did generalized
"migratable" flag to be provided by the corresponding trust source's
ops struct.

> > And therefore, how safe is the rest of the extraction into
> > trusted_core.c?
> >
>
> fortunately it gets caught by static analysis, but it does make me also
> concerned about what else has changed and how this gets through review.
>

I agree that extraction into trusted_core.c was a complex change but
this patch has been up for review for almost 2 years [1]. And
extensive testing can't catch this sort of bug as allocation wouldn't
normally fail.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/795416/

-Sumit

> > James
> >
> >
>


Re: [PATCH][next] KEYS: trusted: Fix missing null return from kzalloc call

2021-04-12 Thread Sumit Garg
On Mon, 12 Apr 2021 at 21:31, Colin King  wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King 
>
> The kzalloc call can return null with the GFP_KERNEL flag so
> add a null check and exit via a new error exit label. Use the
> same exit error label for another error path too.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
> Fixes: 830027e2cb55 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
> ---
>  security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 6 --
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>

Ah, it's my bad. Thanks for fixing this issue.

Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg 

-Sumit

> diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c 
> b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> index ec3a066a4b42..90774793f0b1 100644
> --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> @@ -116,11 +116,13 @@ static struct trusted_key_payload 
> *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key *key)
>
> ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
> if (ret < 0)
> -   return p;
> +   goto err;
> p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> +   if (!p)
> +   goto err;
>
> p->migratable = migratable;
> -
> +err:
> return p;
>  }
>
> --
> 2.30.2
>


Re: [PATCH][next] KEYS: trusted: Fix missing null return from kzalloc call

2021-04-12 Thread Colin Ian King
On 12/04/2021 17:48, James Bottomley wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:01 +0100, Colin King wrote:
>> From: Colin Ian King 
>>
>> The kzalloc call can return null with the GFP_KERNEL flag so
>> add a null check and exit via a new error exit label. Use the
>> same exit error label for another error path too.
>>
>> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
>> Fixes: 830027e2cb55 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys
>> framework")
>> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
>> ---
>>  security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 6 --
>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
>> b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
>> index ec3a066a4b42..90774793f0b1 100644
>> --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
>> +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
>> @@ -116,11 +116,13 @@ static struct trusted_key_payload
>> *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key *key)
>>  
>>  ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
>>  if (ret < 0)
>> -return p;
>> +goto err;
>>  p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +if (!p)
>> +goto err;
>>  
>>  p->migratable = migratable;
>> -
>> +err:
>>  return p;
> 
> This is clearly a code migration bug in 
> 
> commit 251c85bd106099e6f388a89e88e12d14de2c9cda
> Author: Sumit Garg 
> Date:   Mon Mar 1 18:41:24 2021 +0530
> 
> KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework
> 
> Which has for addition to trusted_core.c:
> 
> +static struct trusted_key_payload *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key
> *key)
> +{
> +   struct trusted_key_payload *p = NULL;
> +   int ret;
> +
> +   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
> +   if (ret < 0)
> +   return p;
> +   p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> +   p->migratable = migratable;
> +
> +   return p;
> +}
> 
> And for trusted_tpm1.c:
> 
> -static struct trusted_key_payload *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key
> *key)
> -{
> -   struct trusted_key_payload *p = NULL;
> -   int ret;
> -
> -   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof *p);
> -   if (ret < 0)
> -   return p;
> -   p = kzalloc(sizeof *p, GFP_KERNEL);
> -   if (p)
> -   p->migratable = 1; /* migratable by default */
> -   return p;
> -}
> 
> The trusted_tpm1.c code was correct and we got this bug introduced by
> what should have been a simple cut and paste ... how did that happen? 
> And therefore, how safe is the rest of the extraction into
> trusted_core.c?
> 

fortunately it gets caught by static analysis, but it does make me also
concerned about what else has changed and how this gets through review.

> James
> 
> 



Re: [PATCH][next] KEYS: trusted: Fix missing null return from kzalloc call

2021-04-12 Thread James Bottomley
On Mon, 2021-04-12 at 17:01 +0100, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King 
> 
> The kzalloc call can return null with the GFP_KERNEL flag so
> add a null check and exit via a new error exit label. Use the
> same exit error label for another error path too.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
> Fixes: 830027e2cb55 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys
> framework")
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
> ---
>  security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 6 --
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> index ec3a066a4b42..90774793f0b1 100644
> --- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> +++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
> @@ -116,11 +116,13 @@ static struct trusted_key_payload
> *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key *key)
>  
>   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
>   if (ret < 0)
> - return p;
> + goto err;
>   p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!p)
> + goto err;
>  
>   p->migratable = migratable;
> -
> +err:
>   return p;

This is clearly a code migration bug in 

commit 251c85bd106099e6f388a89e88e12d14de2c9cda
Author: Sumit Garg 
Date:   Mon Mar 1 18:41:24 2021 +0530

KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework

Which has for addition to trusted_core.c:

+static struct trusted_key_payload *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key
*key)
+{
+   struct trusted_key_payload *p = NULL;
+   int ret;
+
+   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
+   if (ret < 0)
+   return p;
+   p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
+
+   p->migratable = migratable;
+
+   return p;
+}

And for trusted_tpm1.c:

-static struct trusted_key_payload *trusted_payload_alloc(struct key
*key)
-{
-   struct trusted_key_payload *p = NULL;
-   int ret;
-
-   ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof *p);
-   if (ret < 0)
-   return p;
-   p = kzalloc(sizeof *p, GFP_KERNEL);
-   if (p)
-   p->migratable = 1; /* migratable by default */
-   return p;
-}

The trusted_tpm1.c code was correct and we got this bug introduced by
what should have been a simple cut and paste ... how did that happen? 
And therefore, how safe is the rest of the extraction into
trusted_core.c?

James




[PATCH][next] KEYS: trusted: Fix missing null return from kzalloc call

2021-04-12 Thread Colin King
From: Colin Ian King 

The kzalloc call can return null with the GFP_KERNEL flag so
add a null check and exit via a new error exit label. Use the
same exit error label for another error path too.

Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
Fixes: 830027e2cb55 ("KEYS: trusted: Add generic trusted keys framework")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King 
---
 security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c | 6 --
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c 
b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
index ec3a066a4b42..90774793f0b1 100644
--- a/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
+++ b/security/keys/trusted-keys/trusted_core.c
@@ -116,11 +116,13 @@ static struct trusted_key_payload 
*trusted_payload_alloc(struct key *key)
 
ret = key_payload_reserve(key, sizeof(*p));
if (ret < 0)
-   return p;
+   goto err;
p = kzalloc(sizeof(*p), GFP_KERNEL);
+   if (!p)
+   goto err;
 
p->migratable = migratable;
-
+err:
return p;
 }
 
-- 
2.30.2