> Most comments states Cyrix CPUs when they are using the macros. Is anything
> with Cyrix 64 bit relevant? Maybe "include/asm-x86_64/processor.h" is a
> simple copy of "include/asm-i386/processor.h" and nobody delete the unused
> macros?
It was originally deleted but later readded when the
On Wed, 2 May 2007 09:16:59 +0200 Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > This clashes with Andi's "msr-index" patch:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/msr-index
>
> I see. He also moves these defines to another file. Not problem where they
> are. But it
Hi Andrew,
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 02:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:41 +0200
>
> Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
> > With the macros a
Hi Andrew,
On Wednesday 02 May 2007 02:48, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:41 +0200
Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
With the macros a line like this
On Wed, 2 May 2007 09:16:59 +0200 Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This clashes with Andi's msr-index patch:
ftp://ftp.firstfloor.org/pub/ak/x86_64/quilt/patches/msr-index
I see. He also moves these defines to another file. Not problem where they
are. But it isn't possible to
Most comments states Cyrix CPUs when they are using the macros. Is anything
with Cyrix 64 bit relevant? Maybe include/asm-x86_64/processor.h is a
simple copy of include/asm-i386/processor.h and nobody delete the unused
macros?
It was originally deleted but later readded when the MTRR code
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:41 +0200
Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
> With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
> setCx86(CX86_CCR2,
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:41 +0200
Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) |
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:41 +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
> Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
> With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
> setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
> With inlined functions this line will work as
From: Juergen Beisert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
With inlined functions this line will work as expected.
Note about a
From: Juergen Beisert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
With inlined functions this line will work as expected.
Note about a
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:33:41 +0200, Juergen Beisert wrote:
Replace NSC/Cyrix specific chipset access macros by inlined functions.
With the macros a line like this fails (and does nothing):
setCx86(CX86_CCR2, getCx86(CX86_CCR2) | 0x88);
With inlined functions this line will work as
12 matches
Mail list logo
