On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 22:42 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 09, 2013 08:11:19 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 01:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen
On Sun, 2013-08-11 at 22:42 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 08:11:19 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 01:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 08:11:19 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 01:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> > > > On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > >
On Friday, August 09, 2013 08:11:19 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 01:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue,
On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 01:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> > > On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > >
On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> > On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> > >> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
> On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> >> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
> >> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus
On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears
On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with
On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have
On Sat, 2013-08-10 at 01:29 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Friday, August 09, 2013 04:16:56 PM Toshi Kani wrote:
On Fri, 2013-08-09 at 15:28 +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
On 08/07/2013 12:56 AM, Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
(2013/08/09 11:43), Gu Zheng wrote:
> Hi Ishimatsu-san,
> On 08/06/2013 06:11 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
>
>> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
>> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
>> been removed,
Hi Ishimatsu-san,
On 08/06/2013 06:11 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
> been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
>
> But
Hi Ishimatsu-san,
On 08/06/2013 06:11 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
But
(2013/08/09 11:43), Gu Zheng wrote:
Hi Ishimatsu-san,
On 08/06/2013 06:11 PM, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node()
(2013/08/07 1:56), Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears the
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
> try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
> removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
> been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
>
> But
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
But try_offline_node() called from acpi_processor_remove() never clears
the node
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
But try_offline_node() called from acpi_processor_remove() never clears
the node
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears the node information.
But
(2013/08/07 1:56), Toshi Kani wrote:
On Tue, 2013-08-06 at 19:11 +0900, Yasuaki Ishimatsu wrote:
try_offline_node() checks that all cpus related with removed node have been
removed by using cpu_present_bits. If all cpus related with removed node have
been removed, try_offline_node() clears the
22 matches
Mail list logo