On Sunday, March 02, 2014 08:53:57 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/3/2 8:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> Do we still want to set this if the check below fails? If so, then why?
> >>>
> >>> We know \_S5_ is valid. The fault is sleep
On Sunday, March 02, 2014 08:53:57 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/3/2 8:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Do we still want to set this if the check below fails? If so, then why?
We know \_S5_ is valid. The fault is sleep registers, not
On 2014/3/2 8:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Do we still want to set this if the check below fails? If so, then why?
>>>
>>> We know \_S5_ is valid. The fault is sleep registers, not S5 ACPI object
>>
>> Hi Rafael, do you still have
On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/2/28 13:33, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> > On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> >>> Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
> >>> install
On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/2/28 13:33, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
install
On 2014/3/2 8:39, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, March 01, 2014 06:24:23 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Do we still want to set this if the check below fails? If so, then why?
We know \_S5_ is valid. The fault is sleep registers, not S5 ACPI object
Hi Rafael, do you still have any concern?
On 2014/2/28 13:33, Li, Aubrey wrote:
> On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
>>> Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
>>> install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
>>>
On 2014/2/28 13:33, Li, Aubrey wrote:
On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
>> install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
>> acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should
On 2014/2/27 7:50, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should not
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
> Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
> install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
> acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should not allow a not-working
> pm_power_off function
On Wednesday, February 26, 2014 10:46:37 AM Li, Aubrey wrote:
Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should not allow a not-working
pm_power_off function
Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should not allow a not-working
pm_power_off function hooked.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li
---
drivers/acpi/sleep.c |7
Sleep control and status registers need santity check before ACPI
install acpi_power_off to pm_power_off hook. The checking code in
acpi_enter_sleep_state() is too late, we should not allow a not-working
pm_power_off function hooked.
Signed-off-by: Aubrey Li aubrey...@intel.com
---
14 matches
Mail list logo