On 3/29/2013 6:03 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> [Dropped Kevin Hilman, because Kevin's address bounces.]
Use khil...@deeprootsystems.com as updated in MAINTAINERS.
>
> On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 12:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> The DaVinci debugging macro contains a check for
>>
On 3/29/2013 6:03 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
[Dropped Kevin Hilman, because Kevin's address bounces.]
Use khil...@deeprootsystems.com as updated in MAINTAINERS.
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 12:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
The DaVinci debugging macro contains a check for
[Dropped Kevin Hilman, because Kevin's address bounces.]
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 12:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> The DaVinci debugging macro contains a check for
> CONFIG_DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART0. But there's corresponding Kconfig
[...] there's no corresponding
The DaVinci debugging macro contains a check for
CONFIG_DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART0. But there's corresponding Kconfig
symbol, so this test will always evaluate to false. That Kconfig symbol
is not needed because, as __arch_decomp_setup() shows, there are no
DaVinci DA8XX boards that use UART0 for
The DaVinci debugging macro contains a check for
CONFIG_DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART0. But there's corresponding Kconfig
symbol, so this test will always evaluate to false. That Kconfig symbol
is not needed because, as __arch_decomp_setup() shows, there are no
DaVinci DA8XX boards that use UART0 for
[Dropped Kevin Hilman, because Kevin's address bounces.]
On Fri, 2013-03-29 at 12:47 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
The DaVinci debugging macro contains a check for
CONFIG_DEBUG_DAVINCI_DA8XX_UART0. But there's corresponding Kconfig
[...] there's no corresponding
6 matches
Mail list logo
