Hello Anand,
On 09/28/2015 12:10 PM, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
[snip]
>>
>> - ldo10_reg: ldo10 {
>> - regulator-compatible = "LDO10";
> Missing the node name 'LDO10'
>> + ldo10_reg: DO10 {
Thanks for pointing
Hi Javier,
On 25 September 2015 at 19:14, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
> deprecated and the correct approach is to use the node's name.
>
> This patch has no functional changes but by not using a deprecated
> property, new
Hello Anand,
On 09/28/2015 12:10 PM, Anand Moon wrote:
> Hi Javier,
>
[snip]
>>
>> - ldo10_reg: ldo10 {
>> - regulator-compatible = "LDO10";
> Missing the node name 'LDO10'
>> + ldo10_reg: DO10 {
Thanks for pointing
Hi Javier,
On 25 September 2015 at 19:14, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
> deprecated and the correct approach is to use the node's name.
>
> This patch has no functional changes but by not using a
The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
deprecated and the correct approach is to use the node's name.
This patch has no functional changes but by not using a deprecated
property, new DTS based on this one will not carry the same issue.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez
The regulator-compatible property from the regulator DT binding was
deprecated and the correct approach is to use the node's name.
This patch has no functional changes but by not using a deprecated
property, new DTS based on this one will not carry the same issue.
Signed-off-by: Javier Martinez
6 matches
Mail list logo