On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 06:45:36AM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
> - If pm-runtime is not enabled then we need something to manage the
> clocks for the driver. If we put that code in the driver then there
> is not a lot of point in having the pm-runtime clock code here as
> the driver really only
Hi Ben,
On Monday 13 January 2014 06:45:36 Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 12/01/14 22:01, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Sunday 12 January 2014 22:54:15 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >> Hi Ben,
> >>
> >> Thank you for the patch.
> >>
> >> On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:06:29 Ben Dooks wrote:
> >>> If the ker
If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
support built in, then the drivers/sh is not built. This contains drivers
that are essential to devices support by that configuration, including the
PM runtime code in drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c (which implicitly enables the
bus
Hi Ben,
On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 13/01/14 09:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Ben Dooks
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> --- a/drivers/sh/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/sh/Makefile
>>> @@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
>>> #
>>> obj-y := intc/
>>>
>>> +ifeq ($(CO
On 13/01/14 09:28, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
--- a/drivers/sh/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/sh/Makefile
@@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
#
obj-y := intc/
+ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK),n)
obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK) += clk/
+endif
+
This part breaks my Koels
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 4:18 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> --- a/drivers/sh/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/sh/Makefile
> @@ -3,7 +3,10 @@
> #
> obj-y := intc/
>
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMMON_CLK),n)
> obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_CLK) += clk/
> +endif
> +
This part breaks my Koelsch legacy (non-reference) build:
On 12/01/14 22:01, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ben,
On Sunday 12 January 2014 22:54:15 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the patch.
On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:06:29 Ben Dooks wrote:
If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
support built in, then
On 13/01/14 00:30, Simon Horman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:18:15PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
support built in, then the drivers/sh is not built. This contains drivers
that are essential to devices support by that confi
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 03:18:15PM +, Ben Dooks wrote:
> If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
> support built in, then the drivers/sh is not built. This contains drivers
> that are essential to devices support by that configuration, including the
> PM runtime
Hi Ben,
On Sunday 12 January 2014 22:54:15 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:06:29 Ben Dooks wrote:
> > If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
> > support built in, then the drivers/sh is not built.
Hi Ben,
Thank you for the patch.
On Saturday 11 January 2014 13:06:29 Ben Dooks wrote:
> If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
> support built in, then the drivers/sh is not built. This contains drivers
> that are essential to devices support by that configurati
If the kernel is built to support multi-arm configurmation with shmobile
support built in, then the drivers/sh is not built. This contains drivers
that are essential to devices support by that configuration, including the
PM runtime code in drivers/sh/pm_runtime.c (which implicitly enables the
bus
12 matches
Mail list logo
