On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
>
> > The PRCMU's Tightly Coupled Data Memory on the DB8540 platform is
> > 8kB larger than it's predecessor's. We need to reflect that in its
> > Device Tree. By re-specifying the address and size of
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> The PRCMU's Tightly Coupled Data Memory on the DB8540 platform is
> 8kB larger than it's predecessor's. We need to reflect that in its
> Device Tree. By re-specifying the address and size of the device
> we effectively over-ride the previous
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The PRCMU's Tightly Coupled Data Memory on the DB8540 platform is
8kB larger than it's predecessor's. We need to reflect that in its
Device Tree. By re-specifying the address and size of the device
we effectively over-ride
On Tue, 23 Apr 2013, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Lee Jones lee.jo...@linaro.org wrote:
The PRCMU's Tightly Coupled Data Memory on the DB8540 platform is
8kB larger than it's predecessor's. We need to reflect that in its
Device Tree. By re-specifying the address
The PRCMU's Tightly Coupled Data Memory on the DB8540 platform is
8kB larger than it's predecessor's. We need to reflect that in its
Device Tree. By re-specifying the address and size of the device
we effectively over-ride the previous values with more accurate
ones.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
---
The PRCMU's Tightly Coupled Data Memory on the DB8540 platform is
8kB larger than it's predecessor's. We need to reflect that in its
Device Tree. By re-specifying the address and size of the device
we effectively over-ride the previous values with more accurate
ones.
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones
6 matches
Mail list logo
