On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 10:30:53PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 01.02.2016 22:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> > No, that's completely broken. We can't do a raw read from a regmap that
> > doesn't offer raw access and we shouldn't pretend to do so. If the
> > caller is capable of substituting a
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 7:30 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
wrote:
> So can regcache initialization be changed to use register by register read
> in case raw read fails?
>
> Since other option for drivers like SSI which are memory mapped and
> don't offer ability to reset their register values to default
On 01.02.2016 22:10, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:58:06PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
>
>> Looks like a possible solution would be to change
>> regmap_raw_read() to do read using _regmap_read in
>> case the cache is bypassed and there is no ->read
>> callback defined for re
On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 05:58:06PM +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> Looks like a possible solution would be to change
> regmap_raw_read() to do read using _regmap_read in
> case the cache is bypassed and there is no ->read
> callback defined for regmap implementation.
No, that's completely bro
On 01.02.2016 13:25, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> On 01.02.2016 13:13, Fabio Estevam wrote:
>> Hi Maciej,
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
>> wrote:
>>> Is regmap patch from
>>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2161934.html
>>> applied to the tested tree?
>>
>> Yes,
On 01.02.2016 13:13, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
> wrote:
>> Is regmap patch from
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2161934.html
>> applied to the tested tree?
>
> Yes, linux-next 20160201 contains this patch.
Hmm, I will tr
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
wrote:
> Is regmap patch from
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg2161934.html
> applied to the tested tree?
Yes, linux-next 20160201 contains this patch.
Hi Fabio,
On 01.02.2016 13:05, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
> wrote:
>> There is no guarantee that on fsl_ssi module load
>> SSI registers will have their power-on-reset values.
>>
>> In fact, if the driver is reloaded the values in
>
Hi Maciej,
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Maciej S. Szmigiero
wrote:
> There is no guarantee that on fsl_ssi module load
> SSI registers will have their power-on-reset values.
>
> In fact, if the driver is reloaded the values in
> registers will be whatever they were set to previously.
>
> Howe
9 matches
Mail list logo