On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 4:08 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:48:50PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> On 21 March 2013 15:16, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:18:20PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> >> In of_dma_controller_register() routine we are calling of_get_pr
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 03:48:50PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 21 March 2013 15:16, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:18:20PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> In of_dma_controller_register() routine we are calling of_get_property()
> >> as an
> >> parameter to be32_to_cpup(). In
On 21 March 2013 15:16, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:18:20PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
>> In of_dma_controller_register() routine we are calling of_get_property() as
>> an
>> parameter to be32_to_cpup(). In case the property doesn't exist we will get a
>> crash.
>>
>> This patc
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 02:18:20PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> In of_dma_controller_register() routine we are calling of_get_property() as an
> parameter to be32_to_cpup(). In case the property doesn't exist we will get a
> crash.
>
> This patch changes this code to check if we got a valid proper
In of_dma_controller_register() routine we are calling of_get_property() as an
parameter to be32_to_cpup(). In case the property doesn't exist we will get a
crash.
This patch changes this code to check if we got a valid property first and then
runs be32_to_cpup() on it.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kuma
5 matches
Mail list logo