On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 06:53:06AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> At most, they will ask their distro vendor for continued support of the
> feature (which there will be in the same minor release), and if vendors'
> feedback show there is enough demand, then we will just have to delay the
> remo
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 01:02:50AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:45:40AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:17:51AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:12:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:43
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:45:40AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:17:51AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:12:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:43:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:17:51AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:12:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:43:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:24:33AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> > >
> > > > Then a printk() on e
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 05:12:42AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:43:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:24:33AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> >
> > > Then a printk() on every open() should be enough. We've all been seeing
> > > "Warning:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 07:43:18PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:24:33AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> > Then a printk() on every open() should be enough. We've all been seeing
> > "Warning: tcpdump uses obsolete AF_PACKET"... and it finally disappeared.
>
> There's a
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:42:36 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:27:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > [1] Though admittedly the one in RHEL deviates from upstream
> > > as it contains performance enhancements that were vetoed from
> > > upstream accepta
On Thu, Mar 22, 2007 at 12:24:33AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Then a printk() on every open() should be enough. We've all been seeing
> "Warning: tcpdump uses obsolete AF_PACKET"... and it finally disappeared.
There's a difference. We have the source for tcpdump.
Dave
--
http://
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:27:17PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > [1] Though admittedly the one in RHEL deviates from upstream
> > as it contains performance enhancements that were vetoed from
> > upstream acceptance due to it being "deprecated".
>
> What enhancements are they?
Hmm, actuall
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 19:19:35 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:19:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > We've given people years of notice and _some_ applications have converted
> > over to open("/dev/sda1", O_DIRECT), as they should.
> >
> > Sure, it'
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 04:13:41PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:10:50 +
> Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > > This is a user visible API it is therefore not elligable for removal
> > > > anyway
> > >
> > > mutter.
> > >
> > > We've given people years of noti
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 03:19:52PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> We've given people years of notice and _some_ applications have converted
> over to open("/dev/sda1", O_DIRECT), as they should.
>
> Sure, it's a small and simple driver (now), so the cost of maintaining it
> is low.
>
> But
On Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:10:50 +
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is a user visible API it is therefore not elligable for removal
> > > anyway
> >
> > mutter.
> >
> > We've given people years of notice and _some_ applications have converted
> > over to open("/dev/sda1", O_DIRECT)
> > This is a user visible API it is therefore not elligable for removal
> > anyway
>
> mutter.
>
> We've given people years of notice and _some_ applications have converted
> over to open("/dev/sda1", O_DIRECT), as they should.
Linus said we don't break old applications by removing APIs. People
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 18:14:42 +
Alan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:57:36 -0400
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:57:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Delete the a
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Alan Cox wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:57:36 -0400
> Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:57:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > >
> > > > Delete the allegedly obsolete raw driver feature
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:57:36 -0400
Dave Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:57:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > Delete the allegedly obsolete raw driver feature, which has been
> > > marked for death since 200
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 04:57:57PM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Delete the allegedly obsolete raw driver feature, which has been
> > marked for death since 2005.
>
> I think it would be better to replace it with a wrapper
> that forces O_D
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> "Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Delete the allegedly obsolete raw driver feature, which has been
> > marked for death since 2005.
>
> I think it would be better to replace it with a wrapper that forces
> O_DIRECT and opens the underlyin
"Robert P. J. Day" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Delete the allegedly obsolete raw driver feature, which has been
> marked for death since 2005.
I think it would be better to replace it with a wrapper
that forces O_DIRECT and opens the underlying block device. I suspect
just dropping it will br
Delete the allegedly obsolete raw driver feature, which has been
marked for death since 2005.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
compile-tested with "make allyesconfig" under x86.
Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt |8
Documentation/ioctl-number.txt
21 matches
Mail list logo
