Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-23 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/17/2013 08:34:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 > Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. >> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-23 Thread Rob Landley
On 07/17/2013 08:34:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote: On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. Here we update references to be 3.x based,

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-17 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 > Paul Gortmaker wrote: > >> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. >> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating >> some dates and statistics. > > Ccing the

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-17 Thread Paul Gortmaker
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote: On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating some dates and

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-16 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. > Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating > some dates and statistics. Ccing the author of the document never hurts :) I actually went

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-16 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating some dates and statistics. Ccing the author of the document never hurts

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > > > > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 19:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: [...] > Some kernels are designated "long term" kernels; they will receive support > for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels > and their maintainers are: > > - 2.6.27 Willy Tarreau

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next > where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content > on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content shouldn't appear in > the

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 10:15) Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Good work! > > On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker > wrote: > > > > Linux-next trees are announced

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, Good work! On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker wrote: > > Linux-next trees are announced on the linux-kernel and linux-next mailing > lists when they are assembled; they can be downloaded from: > > - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/ >

[PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating some dates and statistics. Also update information pertaining to longterm releases. Here I have intentionally left out any mention of the v2.6.34.x longterm,

[PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011. Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating some dates and statistics. Also update information pertaining to longterm releases. Here I have intentionally left out any mention of the v2.6.34.x longterm,

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, Good work! On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: Linux-next trees are announced on the linux-kernel and linux-next mailing lists when they are assembled; they can be downloaded from: -

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 10:15) Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Paul, Good work! On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: Linux-next trees are announced on the linux

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Stephen Rothwell
Hi Paul, On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Ben Hutchings
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 19:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote: [...] Some kernels are designated long term kernels; they will receive support for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels and their maintainers are: - 2.6.27 Willy Tarreau (Deep-frozen

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process

2013-07-15 Thread Paul Gortmaker
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process] On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote: Hi Paul, On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote: On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread