On 07/17/2013 08:34:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
>> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means
On 07/17/2013 08:34:08 AM, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
Here we update references to be 3.x based,
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400
> Paul Gortmaker wrote:
>
>> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
>> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating
>> some dates and statistics.
>
> Ccing the
On 13-07-16 01:33 PM, Jonathan Corbet wrote:
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating
some dates and
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400
Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
> Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating
> some dates and statistics.
Ccing the author of the document never hurts :)
I actually went
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400
Paul Gortmaker paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating
some dates and statistics.
Ccing the author of the document never hurts
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process]
On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> >
> > On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 19:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[...]
> Some kernels are designated "long term" kernels; they will receive support
> for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels
> and their maintainers are:
>
> - 2.6.27 Willy Tarreau
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
>
> On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next
> where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content
> on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content shouldn't appear in
> the
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process]
On 16/07/2013 (Tue 10:15) Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Good work!
>
> On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> >
> > Linux-next trees are announced
Hi Paul,
Good work!
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
>
> Linux-next trees are announced on the linux-kernel and linux-next mailing
> lists when they are assembled; they can be downloaded from:
>
> - http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/sfr/linux-next/
>
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating
some dates and statistics.
Also update information pertaining to longterm releases. Here I have
intentionally left out any mention of the v2.6.34.x longterm,
The last mainline release of a v2.6.x kernel was back in May 2011.
Here we update references to be 3.x based, which also means updating
some dates and statistics.
Also update information pertaining to longterm releases. Here I have
intentionally left out any mention of the v2.6.34.x longterm,
Hi Paul,
Good work!
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
Linux-next trees are announced on the linux-kernel and linux-next mailing
lists when they are assembled; they can be downloaded from:
-
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process]
On 16/07/2013 (Tue 10:15) Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Paul,
Good work!
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:34:44 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
Linux-next trees are announced on the linux
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread on linux-next
where we were indicating that people shouldn't rebase linux-next content
on a whim, and that new devel (vs. bugfix) content
On Mon, 2013-07-15 at 19:34 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
[...]
Some kernels are designated long term kernels; they will receive support
for a longer period. As of this writing, the current long term kernels
and their maintainers are:
- 2.6.27 Willy Tarreau (Deep-frozen
[Re: [PATCH] Documentation: update references to v2.6.x in development-process]
On 16/07/2013 (Tue 13:50) Stephen Rothwell wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 22:13:50 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
paul.gortma...@windriver.com wrote:
On a similar note, I was thinking about the recent thread
18 matches
Mail list logo