Re: [PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

On 12/14/15, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/14/15 13:03, Jeff Merkey wrote: >> Please consider the attached patch. >> >> I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have >> determined it will function and support all of the software that >> depends on this handler properly. I have

Re: [PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

On 12/14/15 13:03, Jeff Merkey wrote: > Please consider the attached patch. > > I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have > determined it will function and support all of the software that > depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this > patch with a test

[PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

Please consider the attached patch. I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have determined it will function and support all of the software that depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this patch with a test harness that tests the robustness of the linux

[PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

Please consider the attached patch. I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have determined it will function and support all of the software that depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this patch with a test harness that tests the robustness of the linux

[PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

Please consider the attached patch. I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have determined it will function and support all of the software that depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this patch with a test harness that tests the robustness of the linux

Re: [PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

On 12/14/15 13:03, Jeff Merkey wrote: > Please consider the attached patch. > > I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have > determined it will function and support all of the software that > depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this > patch with a test

Re: [PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

On 12/14/15, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 12/14/15 13:03, Jeff Merkey wrote: >> Please consider the attached patch. >> >> I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have >> determined it will function and support all of the software that >> depends on this handler

[PATCH] Fix int1 recursion with unregistered breakpoints

Please consider the attached patch. I have reviewed all the code that touches this patch and have determined it will function and support all of the software that depends on this handler properly. I have compiled and tested this patch with a test harness that tests the robustness of the linux