On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> I know I requested a v2, but meanwhile some users are experiencing
> delays at resume:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196851
>
> Jiri, could you take this one in v4.14 (maybe with @stable) and we'll
> figure out a way to fix this
On Fri, 8 Sep 2017, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> I know I requested a v2, but meanwhile some users are experiencing
> delays at resume:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196851
>
> Jiri, could you take this one in v4.14 (maybe with @stable) and we'll
> figure out a way to fix this
On Jul 24 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 10:15 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jul 22 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude wrote:
> > > So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been
> > > broken on
> > > hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly
On Jul 24 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude Paul wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 10:15 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> > On Jul 22 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude wrote:
> > > So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been
> > > broken on
> > > hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly
Yeah I noticed that, sorry if my response wasn't very clear! Should
probably wait to have my morning coffee before responding to these
messages :P
On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 21:28 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Lyude Paul wrote:
>
> > > > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume()
Yeah I noticed that, sorry if my response wasn't very clear! Should
probably wait to have my morning coffee before responding to these
messages :P
On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 21:28 +0200, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Lyude Paul wrote:
>
> > > > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume()
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure that
> > > the
> > > device is alive before we try talking to it.
> > >
> > > This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID.
> > > - int ret;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> >
> > What's
On Mon, 24 Jul 2017, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure that
> > > the
> > > device is alive before we try talking to it.
> > >
> > > This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID.
> > > - int ret;
> > > + int ret = 0;
> >
> > What's
On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 10:15 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jul 22 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude wrote:
> > So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been
> > broken on
> > hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly coincidence that was
> > relying on the HID device to
On Mon, 2017-07-24 at 10:15 +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> On Jul 22 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude wrote:
> > So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been
> > broken on
> > hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly coincidence that was
> > relying on the HID device to
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 12:54 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Lyude wrote:
>
> > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure that
> > the
> > device is alive before we try talking to it.
> >
> > This fixes RMI device
On Sun, 2017-07-23 at 12:54 +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Lyude wrote:
>
> > So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure that
> > the
> > device is alive before we try talking to it.
> >
> > This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID.
> > -
On Jul 22 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude wrote:
> So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been broken on
> hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly coincidence that was
> relying on the HID device to already be opened upon resume. This means
> that so long as anything was
On Jul 22 2017 or thereabouts, Lyude wrote:
> So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been broken on
> hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly coincidence that was
> relying on the HID device to already be opened upon resume. This means
> that so long as anything was
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Lyude wrote:
> So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure that the
> device is alive before we try talking to it.
>
> This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID.
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
What's the point?
On Sun, Jul 23, 2017 at 4:15 AM, Lyude wrote:
> So, call hid_hw_open() in rmi_post_resume() so we make sure that the
> device is alive before we try talking to it.
>
> This fixes RMI device suspend/resume over HID.
> - int ret;
> + int ret = 0;
What's the point?
>
> if
So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been broken on
hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly coincidence that was
relying on the HID device to already be opened upon resume. This means
that so long as anything was reading the /dev/input/eventX node for for
an RMI device,
So it looks like that suspend/resume has actually always been broken on
hid-rmi. The fact it worked was a rather silly coincidence that was
relying on the HID device to already be opened upon resume. This means
that so long as anything was reading the /dev/input/eventX node for for
an RMI device,
18 matches
Mail list logo