> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > i've extracted the error condition in a small userspace application for
> > demonstration. Just compile and see that in this case the variable H3 is
> > zero
> > but the whole term evaluates
> On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> > Hi Matt,
> >
> > i've extracted the error condition in a small userspace application for
> > demonstration. Just compile and see that in this case the variable H3 is
> > zero
> > but the whole term evaluates differently if treated as
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> i've extracted the error condition in a small userspace application for
> demonstration. Just compile and see that in this case the variable H3 is zero
> but the whole term evaluates differently if treated
On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 12:27 PM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> Hi Matt,
>
> i've extracted the error condition in a small userspace application for
> demonstration. Just compile and see that in this case the variable H3 is zero
> but the whole term evaluates differently if treated as unsigned or
Hi Matt,
i've extracted the error condition in a small userspace application for
demonstration. Just compile and see that in this case the variable H3 is zero
but the whole term evaluates differently if treated as unsigned or signed.
The whole example including the values of the variables are
Hi Matt,
i've extracted the error condition in a small userspace application for
demonstration. Just compile and see that in this case the variable H3 is zero
but the whole term evaluates differently if treated as unsigned or signed.
The whole example including the values of the variables are
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Matt Ranostay
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron
On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 11:16 PM, Matt Ranostay
wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
>>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>>> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>>> >> While calculating
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> >> While
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 10:29 AM, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
>> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> >> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
>> >>
On 2 April 2017 18:29:49 BST, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron
>wrote:
>> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> >> While
On 2 April 2017 18:29:49 BST, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
>> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron
>wrote:
>> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> >> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are
>negative
>> >>
Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> >> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
> >> values interpreted as
Linus Walleij schrieb am Sun, 02. Apr 16:56:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> >> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
> >> values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
>> values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
>> These values need to be casted
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 11:32 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
>> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
>> values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
>> These values need to be casted to signed as
On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
> values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
> These values need to be casted to signed as indicated by the documentation
> of the sensor.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On 27/03/17 11:06, Andreas Klinger wrote:
> While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
> values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
> These values need to be casted to signed as indicated by the documentation
> of the sensor.
>
> Signed-off-by:
While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
These values need to be casted to signed as indicated by the documentation
of the sensor.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger
---
While calculating the compensation of the humidity there are negative
values interpreted as unsigned because of unsigned variables used.
These values need to be casted to signed as indicated by the documentation
of the sensor.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Klinger
---
20 matches
Mail list logo