2013/2/2 anish kumar :
> On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> 2012/11/3 anish kumar :
>> > From: anish kumar
>> >
>> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
>> > it is better to just make it void.
>> >
>> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
>> >
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> 2012/11/3 anish kumar :
> > From: anish kumar
> >
> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> > it is better to just make it void.
> >
> > Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
> > Signed-off-by: anish kumar
> > ---
> >
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/11/3 anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
2013/2/2 anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com:
On Sat, 2013-01-26 at 17:24 +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
2012/11/3 anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to
From: anish kumar
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
Signed-off-by: anish kumar
---
include/linux/irq_work.h |2 +-
kernel/irq_work.c|5 ++---
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 4
2012/11/3 anish kumar :
> From: anish kumar
>
> As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> it is better to just make it void.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
> Signed-off-by: anish kumar
> ---
> kernel/irq_work.c |5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3
2012/11/3 anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: anish kumar
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
---
include/linux/irq_work.h |2 +-
From: anish kumar
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
Signed-off-by: anish kumar
---
kernel/irq_work.c |5 ++---
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
Signed-off-by: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
---
kernel/irq_work.c |5 ++---
1 files
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 22:24 +0900, anish kumar wrote:
> > From: anish kumar
> >
> > As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> > it is better to just make it void.
>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
>
> Peter, like to take this
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 22:24 +0900, anish kumar wrote:
> From: anish kumar
>
> As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
> it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt
Peter, like to take this patch? Or is there a reason you have for
irq_work_queue()
From: anish kumar
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar
---
kernel/irq_work.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq_work.c b/kernel/irq_work.c
index
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Signed-off-by: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
---
kernel/irq_work.c |6 +++---
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 22:24 +0900, anish kumar wrote:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
Peter, like to take this patch? Or is there a
On Fri, 2 Nov 2012, Steven Rostedt wrote:
On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 22:24 +0900, anish kumar wrote:
From: anish kumar anish198519851...@gmail.com
As no one is using the return value of irq_work_queue function
it is better to just make it void.
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt rost...@goodmis.org
16 matches
Mail list logo
