Re: [PATCH] Input: cyapa - mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-10-15 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 05:38:24PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "Fallthrough state" > commern with a proper "Fall through",

Re: [PATCH] Input: cyapa - mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-10-15 Thread Dmitry Torokhov
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 05:38:24PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases > where we are expecting to fall through. > > Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "Fallthrough state" > commern with a proper "Fall through",

[PATCH] Input: cyapa - mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-10-08 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "Fallthrough state" commern with a proper "Fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114758

[PATCH] Input: cyapa - mark expected switch fall-throughs

2018-10-08 Thread Gustavo A. R. Silva
In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases where we are expecting to fall through. Notice that in this particular case, I replaced the "Fallthrough state" commern with a proper "Fall through", which is what GCC is expecting to find. Addresses-Coverity-ID: 114758