On 17.02.2015 19:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]:
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
No body?
bah! That mutt thing is too fast.
The raw conversation
On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
> Thanks! Will send a patchset separating these 2 functional changes - the
> openpic raw_spinlock for upstream ppc (since it doesn't bring any
> changes anyway), and the MAX_VCPUS limitation for the RT tree.
thanks. please cc me on both.
>> This
On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Thanks! Will send a patchset separating these 2 functional changes - the
openpic raw_spinlock for upstream ppc (since it doesn't bring any
changes anyway), and the MAX_VCPUS limitation for the RT tree.
thanks. please cc me on both.
This
On 17.02.2015 19:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]:
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
No body?
bah! That mutt thing is too fast.
The raw conversation
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]:
>* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
>
>>Ping?
>>
>>On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
>>>Ping?
>
>No body?
bah! That mutt thing is too fast.
The raw conversation looks sane and could go upstream. This other
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
>Ping?
>
>On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
>>Ping?
No body?
Sebatian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]:
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
No body?
bah! That mutt thing is too fast.
The raw conversation looks sane and could go upstream. This other chunk:
|+#if
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]:
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
No body?
Sebatian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
Ping?
On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote:
Ping?
On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT
Ping?
On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer
guarantees that EPR is atomic
Ping?
On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote:
This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest
deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP.
The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer
guarantees that EPR is atomic
12 matches
Mail list logo