Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-18 Thread Purcareata Bogdan
On 17.02.2015 19:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]: * Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]: Ping? On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Ping? No body? bah! That mutt thing is too fast. The raw conversation

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-18 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: > Thanks! Will send a patchset separating these 2 functional changes - the > openpic raw_spinlock for upstream ppc (since it doesn't bring any > changes anyway), and the MAX_VCPUS limitation for the RT tree. thanks. please cc me on both. >> This

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-18 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
On 02/18/2015 09:31 AM, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Thanks! Will send a patchset separating these 2 functional changes - the openpic raw_spinlock for upstream ppc (since it doesn't bring any changes anyway), and the MAX_VCPUS limitation for the RT tree. thanks. please cc me on both. This

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-18 Thread Purcareata Bogdan
On 17.02.2015 19:59, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: * Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]: * Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]: Ping? On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Ping? No body? bah! That mutt thing is too fast. The raw conversation

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-17 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]: >* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]: > >>Ping? >> >>On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: >>>Ping? > >No body? bah! That mutt thing is too fast. The raw conversation looks sane and could go upstream. This other

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-17 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]: >Ping? > >On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: >>Ping? No body? Sebatian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-17 Thread Purcareata Bogdan
Ping? On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Ping? On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote: This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP. The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-17 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Sebastian Andrzej Siewior | 2015-02-17 18:53:17 [+0100]: * Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]: Ping? On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Ping? No body? bah! That mutt thing is too fast. The raw conversation looks sane and could go upstream. This other chunk: |+#if

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-17 Thread Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
* Purcareata Bogdan | 2015-02-17 14:27:44 [+0200]: Ping? On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Ping? No body? Sebatian -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-17 Thread Purcareata Bogdan
Ping? On 02.02.2015 11:35, Purcareata Bogdan wrote: Ping? On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote: This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP. The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-02 Thread Purcareata Bogdan
Ping? On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote: This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP. The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer guarantees that EPR is atomic

Re: [PATCH] KVM: PPC: Convert openpic lock to raw_spinlock

2015-02-02 Thread Purcareata Bogdan
Ping? On 22.01.2015 11:39, Bogdan Purcareata wrote: This patch enables running intensive I/O workloads, e.g. netperf, in a guest deployed on a RT host. It also enable guests to be SMP. The openpic spinlock becomes a sleeping mutex on a RT system. This no longer guarantees that EPR is atomic