Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
-pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
+apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>>>
>>> Why don't we just use pr_debug a
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Il 30/06/2014 19:39, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
>>> Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
>>
>> sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
>> -pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
>> +apic_debug
Il 30/06/2014 19:39, Bandan Das ha scritto:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
-pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
+apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
Why don't w
Il 30/06/2014 03:03, Nadav Amit ha scritto:
sipi_vector = apic->sipi_vector;
-pr_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
+apic_debug("vcpu %d received sipi with vector # %x\n",
Why don't we just use pr_debug all throughout ?
I don't know. I just tried to m
On 6/30/14, 3:48 AM, Bandan Das wrote:
Nadav Amit writes:
In two cases lapic.c does not use the apic_debug macro correctly. This patch
fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.
Nadav Amit writes:
> In two cases lapic.c does not use the apic_debug macro correctly. This patch
> fixes them.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
> i
In two cases lapic.c does not use the apic_debug macro correctly. This patch
fixes them.
Signed-off-by: Nadav Amit
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
index 0069118..3855103 100644
--- a/arch
7 matches
Mail list logo