On Tue, 4 Mar 2014 23:50:44 +, Catalin Marinas
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:03:18PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:23:16AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > > > +ACPI ARM64
> > >
> > > T
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 07:03:18PM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:23:16AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > > +ACPI ARM64
> >
> > That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support,
>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:59:46AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 6:23 PM, Catalin Marinas
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >> +ACPI ARM64
> >
> > That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support,
> > architec
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 06:59:46PM +0800, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 03/03/2014 06:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:15 +0800, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >>> Add maintainers for the arm-core file for arm64 ACPI support
> >>
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:23:16AM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> > +ACPI ARM64
>
> That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support,
> architected peripherals, SoC?
>
Hi Catalin would changing the title to AC
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 7:15 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:59:46AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
>> I agree with merging it with the rest of the series, but comparing it
>> to a blank cheque is not appropriate. Merely having an entry in
>> MAINTAINERS doesn't immediately confer t
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 10:59:46AM +, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 03/03/2014 06:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> >> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:15 +0800, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> >>> Add maintainers for the arm-core file for arm64 ACPI support
> >>
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:28 AM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 06:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:15 +0800, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>>> Add maintainers for the arm-core file for arm64 ACPI support
>>
>> Shouldn't something have to be in the kernel
>> tree before there's a
On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 02:15:45AM +, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> +ACPI ARM64
That's a pretty broad statement for a single file. Is it core support,
architected peripherals, SoC?
> +M: Hanjun Guo
> +M: Graeme Gregory
> +S: Supported
> +L: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> +F: drivers/acpi/
On 03/03/2014 06:21 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:15 +0800, Graeme Gregory wrote:
>> Add maintainers for the arm-core file for arm64 ACPI support
>
> Shouldn't something have to be in the kernel
> tree before there's a MAINTAINERS entry?
or in linux-next and the patch can be a
On Tue, 2014-03-04 at 10:15 +0800, Graeme Gregory wrote:
> Add maintainers for the arm-core file for arm64 ACPI support
Shouldn't something have to be in the kernel
tree before there's a MAINTAINERS entry?
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index c6d0e93..c770d3a 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINER
Add maintainers for the arm-core file for arm64 ACPI support
Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory
---
MAINTAINERS | 7 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index c6d0e93..c770d3a 100644
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@ -259,6 +259,13 @@ F: drivers/pci/*/
12 matches
Mail list logo