Hi Inderpal,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:48:55AM +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote:
> reg_offset is offset of the status/mask registers. Now, since status_base
> and mask_base are pointing to corresponding first registers, reg_offset
> should start from 0 otheriwse regmap_add_irq_chip will fail during
Hi Inderpal,
On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:48:55AM +0530, Inderpal Singh wrote:
reg_offset is offset of the status/mask registers. Now, since status_base
and mask_base are pointing to corresponding first registers, reg_offset
should start from 0 otheriwse regmap_add_irq_chip will fail during
reg_offset is offset of the status/mask registers. Now, since status_base
and mask_base are pointing to corresponding first registers, reg_offset
should start from 0 otheriwse regmap_add_irq_chip will fail during probe.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh
---
It is based on Samuel's for-next-merge
reg_offset is offset of the status/mask registers. Now, since status_base
and mask_base are pointing to corresponding first registers, reg_offset
should start from 0 otheriwse regmap_add_irq_chip will fail during probe.
Signed-off-by: Inderpal Singh inderpal.si...@linaro.org
---
It is based on
4 matches
Mail list logo