On Fri, 5 Mar 2021, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> > Huh? Is that a joke? From the o32 psABI's point of view a MIPS64 CPU is
> > exactly the same as a MIPS32 one (for whatever ISA revision), so there's
> > nothing to support there really other than the CPU/ISA name.
>
> Clang treat MIPS32 as a
在 2021/3/5 上午7:08, Maciej W. Rozycki 写道:
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
This is a known bug [2] with Clang, as Simon Atanasyan said,
"There is no plan on support O32 for MIPS64 due to lack of
resources".
Huh? Is that a joke? From the o32 psABI's point of view a MIPS64 CPU is
On Thu, 4 Mar 2021, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> This is a known bug [2] with Clang, as Simon Atanasyan said,
> "There is no plan on support O32 for MIPS64 due to lack of
> resources".
Huh? Is that a joke? From the o32 psABI's point of view a MIPS64 CPU is
exactly the same as a MIPS32 one (for
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 11:48:09AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> On 03/04/2021 10:02 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:15:44AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> > > When build kernel with Clang [1]:
> > >
> > > $ make CC=clang loongson3_defconfig
> > > $ make CC=clang
>
>
On 03/04/2021 10:02 AM, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:15:44AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
When build kernel with Clang [1]:
$ make CC=clang loongson3_defconfig
$ make CC=clang
[snip]
I think this might be a better solution. I know that I personally never
read defconfig
On Thu, Mar 04, 2021 at 09:15:44AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> When build kernel with Clang [1]:
>
> $ make CC=clang loongson3_defconfig
> $ make CC=clang
>
> there exists the following error:
>
> Checking missing-syscalls for O32
> CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
> error: ABI 'o32' is not
When build kernel with Clang [1]:
$ make CC=clang loongson3_defconfig
$ make CC=clang
there exists the following error:
Checking missing-syscalls for O32
CALLscripts/checksyscalls.sh
error: ABI 'o32' is not supported on CPU 'mips64r2'
make[1]: *** [Kbuild:48: missing-syscalls] Error 1
7 matches
Mail list logo
