On 12/30/2020 12:39 AM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:44:23AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
I have tested the following three configs on the Loongson platform:
(1) !NUMA and !SMP,
(2) !NUMA and SMP,
(3) NUMA and SMP,
everything is all right.
But there exists the following
On Wed, Dec 16, 2020 at 10:44:23AM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> I have tested the following three configs on the Loongson platform:
> (1) !NUMA and !SMP,
> (2) !NUMA and SMP,
> (3) NUMA and SMP,
> everything is all right.
>
> But there exists the following build error under NUMA and !SMP:
>
>
On 12/15/2020 09:21 PM, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:32:52PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
In the current code, we can not build under !CONFIG_NUMA and !CONFIG_SMP
on the Loongson64 platform, it seems bad for the users who just want to
use pure single core (not nosmp) to
On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 08:32:52PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> In the current code, we can not build under !CONFIG_NUMA and !CONFIG_SMP
> on the Loongson64 platform, it seems bad for the users who just want to
> use pure single core (not nosmp) to debug, so do the following things to
> give them a
In the current code, we can not build under !CONFIG_NUMA and !CONFIG_SMP
on the Loongson64 platform, it seems bad for the users who just want to
use pure single core (not nosmp) to debug, so do the following things to
give them a chance:
(1) Do not select NUMA and SMP for MACH_LOONGSON64 in
5 matches
Mail list logo
