Re: [PATCH] Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h

2007-02-17 Thread Tim Schmielau
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > No, that's still crufty. There's no reason why marker.h needs special > treatment whereas, say, jiffies.h does not (is there?) Unforunately, even jiffies.h gets special treatment. sched.h still includes jiffies.h, as this is where it was originally de

Re: [PATCH] Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h

2007-02-16 Thread Andrew Morton
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 13:05:13 -0500 Mathieu Desnoyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h > > * Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Oh. One could whack [include linux/marker.h] in kernel.h: pretty > > much everything includes that. > > > > But it'd be be

[PATCH] Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h

2007-02-16 Thread Mathieu Desnoyers
Move include linux/marker.h to kernel.h * Andrew Morton ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > Oh. One could whack [include linux/marker.h] in kernel.h: pretty > much everything includes that. > > But it'd be better to simply require that the clients of this > infrastructure include the appropriate header