On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:35:30PM +, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> > On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > Applied to for-linus for v4.3 with acks from Myron & Mark, thanks!
> >
> > I removed the stable tag because 932c435caba8 first appeared in
> > v4.3-rc1, so it shouldn't
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Applied to for-linus for v4.3 with acks from Myron & Mark, thanks!
>
> I removed the stable tag because 932c435caba8 first appeared in
> v4.3-rc1, so it shouldn't appear in any stable kernels yet. Right?
I have seen the patch in some
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:17:21AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
> guaranteed that a PCIe device
> On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> Applied to for-linus for v4.3 with acks from Myron & Mark, thanks!
>
> I removed the stable tag because 932c435caba8 first appeared in
> v4.3-rc1, so it shouldn't appear in any stable kernels yet. Right?
I have seen
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:17:21AM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
> guaranteed that a PCIe device
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:35:30PM +, Rustad, Mark D wrote:
> > On Sep 24, 2015, at 11:27 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >
> > Applied to for-linus for v4.3 with acks from Myron & Mark, thanks!
> >
> > I removed the stable tag because 932c435caba8 first appeared in
> >
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Alex Williamson
> wrote:
>
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
> guaranteed that a PCIe device is
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
> guaranteed that a PCIe device is at
On Tue, Sep 15, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Alex Williamson
wrote:
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
> guaranteed
> On Sep 15, 2015, at 10:17 AM, Alex Williamson
> wrote:
>
> Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
> function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
> pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
>
Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
guaranteed that a PCIe device is at slot address 0, but for the
general case, including conventional
Commit 932c435caba8 ("PCI: Add dev_flags bit to access VPD through
function 0") passes PCI_SLOT(devfn) for the devfn parameter of
pci_get_slot(). Generally this works because we're fairly well
guaranteed that a PCIe device is at slot address 0, but for the
general case, including conventional
12 matches
Mail list logo