On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:10:24PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
> it is. The new scsi error stuff does mention that drivers must
> spinunlock/spinlock if it enables interrupts.
Okay, I guess it is safe then.
Tim.
*/
PGP signature
On Sat, Nov 18, 2000 at 05:10:24PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
it is. The new scsi error stuff does mention that drivers must
spinunlock/spinlock if it enables interrupts.
Okay, I guess it is safe then.
Tim.
*/
PGP signature
Tim Waugh wrote:
>
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
>
> > [...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
> > probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
> > parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
>
Tim Waugh wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
[...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
Is that
On Thu, Nov 16, 2000 at 09:50:40PM -0500, John Cavan wrote:
> [...] This patch unlocks, allows the lowlevel driver to do it's
> probes, and then relocks. It could probably be more granular in the
> parport_pc code, but my own home tests show it to be working fine.
Is that safe?
Also, what bit
Jens Axboe wrote:
> Wouldn't it be more interesting to fix the reason the new error
> handling code dies with imm and ppa?
Yes it would... :o) I think I've got it here.
The new error handling code spinlocks the IRQ which cause the lowlevel
parport driver to choke. This patch unlocks, allows the
On Thu, Nov 16 2000, John Cavan wrote:
> > Similar to the imm patch, it's working for me.
> >
> > John
>
> Again... not all screwed up...
> patch -ur linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.h linux.current/drivers/scsi/ppa.h
> --- linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.hThu Sep 14 20:27:05 2000
> +++
John Cavan wrote:
>
> Similar to the imm patch, it's working for me.
>
> John
Again... not all screwed up...
patch -ur linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.h linux.current/drivers/scsi/ppa.h
--- linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.h Thu Sep 14 20:27:05 2000
+++ linux.current/drivers/scsi/ppa.hThu
John Cavan wrote:
Similar to the imm patch, it's working for me.
John
Again... not all screwed up...
patch -ur linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.h linux.current/drivers/scsi/ppa.h
--- linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.h Thu Sep 14 20:27:05 2000
+++ linux.current/drivers/scsi/ppa.hThu Nov
On Thu, Nov 16 2000, John Cavan wrote:
Similar to the imm patch, it's working for me.
John
Again... not all screwed up...
patch -ur linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.h linux.current/drivers/scsi/ppa.h
--- linux.clean/drivers/scsi/ppa.hThu Sep 14 20:27:05 2000
+++
Jens Axboe wrote:
Wouldn't it be more interesting to fix the reason the new error
handling code dies with imm and ppa?
Yes it would... :o) I think I've got it here.
The new error handling code spinlocks the IRQ which cause the lowlevel
parport driver to choke. This patch unlocks, allows the
11 matches
Mail list logo
