Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_FORCE_INLINING from defconfigs

On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 22:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:29:06PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: > > Option has been removed as of: > > 185c045c245f46485ad8bbd8cc1100e986ff3f13 x86, core: remove > > CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING > >... > > I'm not a fan of patching defconfig's

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_FORCE_INLINING from defconfigs

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:29:06PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: > Option has been removed as of: > 185c045c245f46485ad8bbd8cc1100e986ff3f13 x86, core: remove > CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING >... I'm not a fan of patching defconfig's this way - this will only bring tons of patch conflicts (consider

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_FORCE_INLINING from defconfigs

On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:29:06PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: Option has been removed as of: 185c045c245f46485ad8bbd8cc1100e986ff3f13 x86, core: remove CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING ... I'm not a fan of patching defconfig's this way - this will only bring tons of patch conflicts (consider what

Re: [PATCH] Remove CONFIG_FORCE_INLINING from defconfigs

On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 22:53 +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: On Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 12:29:06PM -0800, Harvey Harrison wrote: Option has been removed as of: 185c045c245f46485ad8bbd8cc1100e986ff3f13 x86, core: remove CONFIG_FORCED_INLINING ... I'm not a fan of patching defconfig's this way -