On Sunday 03 February 2008 18:58, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> Do you mean the PRIO_* cases in the switch? They're still independent
> of position after the patch because they don't fall through.
Yes, sure, this is fully correct now. Just if somehting whatsoever
is put ahead touching retval one need
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:54:45AM +0100, Frank Seidel wrote:
> On Sunday 03 February 2008 04:04, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> > This check is not required because the condition is always true.
> > ...
> > - if (niceval > retval)
> > - retval =
On Sunday 03 February 2008 04:04, Rabin Vincent wrote:
> This check is not required because the condition is always true.
> ...
> - if (niceval > retval)
> - retval = niceval;
> + retval = 20 -
On Sunday 03 February 2008 04:04, Rabin Vincent wrote:
This check is not required because the condition is always true.
...
- if (niceval retval)
- retval = niceval;
+ retval = 20 - task_nice(p);
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 10:54:45AM +0100, Frank Seidel wrote:
On Sunday 03 February 2008 04:04, Rabin Vincent wrote:
This check is not required because the condition is always true.
...
- if (niceval retval)
- retval = niceval;
On Sunday 03 February 2008 18:58, Rabin Vincent wrote:
Do you mean the PRIO_* cases in the switch? They're still independent
of position after the patch because they don't fall through.
Yes, sure, this is fully correct now. Just if somehting whatsoever
is put ahead touching retval one need to
This check is not required because the condition is always true.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
kernel/sys.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index d1fe71e..a001974 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++
This check is not required because the condition is always true.
Signed-off-by: Rabin Vincent [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
kernel/sys.c |7 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sys.c b/kernel/sys.c
index d1fe71e..a001974 100644
--- a/kernel/sys.c
+++
8 matches
Mail list logo