On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On 3/21/07, Eric Dumazet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As most shiped linux kernels are now compiled with CONFIG_SMP, there is no way
a preprocessor #if can detect if the machine is UP or SMP. Better to use
num_possible_cpus().
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-
To
On 3/21/07, Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As most shiped linux kernels are now compiled with CONFIG_SMP, there is no way
a preprocessor #if can detect if the machine is UP or SMP. Better to use
num_possible_cpus().
Looks good to me.
Acked-by: Pekka Enberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Eric Dumazet wrote:
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by: Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
The existing comment in mm/slab.c is *perfect*, so I reproduce it :
/*
* CPU bound tasks (e.g. network routing) can exhibit cpu bound
* allocation behaviour: Most allocs on one cpu, most free operations
* on another cpu. For these cases, an efficient object
The existing comment in mm/slab.c is *perfect*, so I reproduce it :
/*
* CPU bound tasks (e.g. network routing) can exhibit cpu bound
* allocation behaviour: Most allocs on one cpu, most free operations
* on another cpu. For these cases, an efficient object
6 matches
Mail list logo
