On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, wrote:
> richard -rw- weinberger 2013-05-13
> 16:08:35:
>
>>
>> I tried to apply/test your patch.
>> It has lots of white spaces damages.
>> Can you please resend it using git send-email?
>> And also run checkpatch.pl before sending.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks,
>>
richard -rw- weinberger 2013-05-13
16:08:35:
>
> I tried to apply/test your patch.
> It has lots of white spaces damages.
> Can you please resend it using git send-email?
> And also run checkpatch.pl before sending.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> //richard
hello:
I use git to remake a patch,
richard -rw- weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com 2013-05-13
16:08:35:
I tried to apply/test your patch.
It has lots of white spaces damages.
Can you please resend it using git send-email?
And also run checkpatch.pl before sending.
--
Thanks,
//richard
hello:
I use git to
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
richard -rw- weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com 2013-05-13
16:08:35:
I tried to apply/test your patch.
It has lots of white spaces damages.
Can you please resend it using git send-email?
And also run checkpatch.pl before
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:31 AM, wrote:
> richard -rw- weinberger write 2013-05-03
> 03:21:33:
>
>> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> >> Hi!
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> > Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
>>
On Fri, May 3, 2013 at 5:31 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
richard -rw- weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com write 2013-05-03
03:21:33:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hello,
richard -rw- weinberger write 2013-05-03
03:21:33:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> > Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
> > patch's
> >> > format, try to submit it again.
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> > Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
> patch's
>> > format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a
> memory
>> > leak which will make
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
patch's
> > format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a
memory
> > leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced in
> >
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
patch's
format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a
memory
leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
patch's
format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a
memory
richard -rw- weinberger richard.weinber...@gmail.com write 2013-05-03
03:21:33:
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 10:30 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wrote:
> Hello,
> Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous patch's
> format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory
> leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced in
> scan_fast(). The
Hi!
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 10:53 AM, wang.bo...@zte.com.cn wrote:
Hello,
Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous patch's
format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory
leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced in
Hello,
Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous patch's
format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory
leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced in
scan_fast(). The following patch fix this problem by use a temporary
Hello,
Sorry, there is something wrong with the previous patch's format, try
to submit it again.
When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory leak which will make destroy_ai()
fail to free the slab.
The following patch base on linux-3.9-rc6 fix this problem.
diff -uprN old_ubi/attach.c
UBI: fix memory leak when use fastmap
When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory leak which will make destroy_ai()
called in ubi_attach fail.
The following patch base on linux-3.9-rc6 fix this problem.
diff -uprN old_ubi/attach.c new_ubi/attach.c
--- old_ubi/attach.c2013-04-08
UBI: fix memory leak when use fastmap
When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory leak which will make destroy_ai()
called in ubi_attach fail.
The following patch base on linux-3.9-rc6 fix this problem.
diff -uprN old_ubi/attach.c new_ubi/attach.c
--- old_ubi/attach.c2013-04-08
Hello,
Sorry, there is something wrong with the previous patch's format, try
to submit it again.
When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory leak which will make destroy_ai()
fail to free the slab.
The following patch base on linux-3.9-rc6 fix this problem.
diff -uprN old_ubi/attach.c
Hello,
Sorry, there is still something wrong with the previous patch's
format, try to submit it again. When use ubi fastmap, there is a memory
leak which will make destroy_ai() fail to free the slab alloced in
scan_fast(). The following patch fix this problem by use a temporary
20 matches
Mail list logo
