Re: [PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-12 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:38 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On second thought, this is probably better since most people will > presumably be booting non-PAE kernels, generating this message when > they've not tried to force the issue seems silly. > > This way, the user will only see a warning if

Re: [PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-12 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:38 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On second thought, this is probably better since most people will > presumably be booting non-PAE kernels, generating this message when > they've not tried to force the issue seems silly. why not go the simple way, and just remove

Re: [PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-12 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:38 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: On second thought, this is probably better since most people will presumably be booting non-PAE kernels, generating this message when they've not tried to force the issue seems silly. why not go the simple way, and just remove noexec=on

Re: [PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-12 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Mon, 2006-12-11 at 21:38 -0500, Kyle McMartin wrote: On second thought, this is probably better since most people will presumably be booting non-PAE kernels, generating this message when they've not tried to force the issue seems silly. This way, the user will only see a warning if they

Re: [PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-11 Thread Kyle McMartin
On second thought, this is probably better since most people will presumably be booting non-PAE kernels, generating this message when they've not tried to force the issue seems silly. This way, the user will only see a warning if they actually go out and specify "noexec=on" on the command line.

[PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-11 Thread Kyle McMartin
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> diff --git a/arch/i386/mm/init.c b/arch/i386/mm/init.c index 84697df..fb61709 100644 --- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c @@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ void __init paging_init(void) set_nx(); if (nx_enabled)

[PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-11 Thread Kyle McMartin
Signed-off-by: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] diff --git a/arch/i386/mm/init.c b/arch/i386/mm/init.c index 84697df..fb61709 100644 --- a/arch/i386/mm/init.c +++ b/arch/i386/mm/init.c @@ -512,6 +512,9 @@ void __init paging_init(void) set_nx(); if (nx_enabled)

Re: [PATCH] Whinge in paging_init if noexec is on with a non-PAE kernel

2006-12-11 Thread Kyle McMartin
On second thought, this is probably better since most people will presumably be booting non-PAE kernels, generating this message when they've not tried to force the issue seems silly. This way, the user will only see a warning if they actually go out and specify noexec=on on the command line.