Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn, endif}

2021-04-15 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 17:08:04 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is > set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S: > > :5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression > .org . - (664b-663b) +

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-15 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 08:50:25AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:02 AM Catalin Marinas > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:25:57AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-15 Thread Sami Tolvanen
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 7:02 AM Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:25:57AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 05:08:04PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > > After commit

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-15 Thread Catalin Marinas
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 06:25:57AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 05:08:04PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > > After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is > > > set

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-15 Thread Nathan Chancellor
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 10:17:43AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 05:08:04PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is > > set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S:

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-15 Thread Catalin Marinas
Hi Nathan, On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 05:08:04PM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is > set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S: > > :5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression > .org . -

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-14 Thread Nick Desaulniers
On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 5:09 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is > set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S: > > :5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression > .org . - (664b-663b) +

Re: [PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-14 Thread Sami Tolvanen
Hi Nathan, On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 5:09 PM Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is > set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S: > > :5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression > .org . -

[PATCH] arm64: alternatives: Move length validation in alternative_{insn,endif}

2021-04-13 Thread Nathan Chancellor
After commit 2decad92f473 ("arm64: mte: Ensure TIF_MTE_ASYNC_FAULT is set atomically"), LLVM's integrated assembler fails to build entry.S: :5:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression .org . - (664b-663b) + (662b-661b) ^ :6:7: error: expected assembly-time absolute expression