On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:23:15AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:49:50PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 08:51:26AM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:23:15AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:49:50PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Aug
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:23:15AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:49:50PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug
On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:23:15AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:49:50PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:49:50PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug
On Tue, Aug 16, 2016 at 12:49:50PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > > parse_arg()
On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 02:40:02PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > > parse_arg()
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
> > >
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 08:00:26PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > > parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
> > >
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
> function instead. There is no funcionality change except that in the
> case of input being too big -ERANGE will be returned instead of -EINVAL
> which
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
> function instead. There is no funcionality change except that in the
> case of input being too big -ERANGE will be returned instead of -EINVAL
> which
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
> > function instead. There is no funcionality change except that in the
> > case of
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 04:15:07PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:57:10PM +0300, Giedrius Statkevičius wrote:
> > parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
> > function instead. There is no funcionality change except that in the
> > case of
parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
function instead. There is no funcionality change except that in the
case of input being too big -ERANGE will be returned instead of -EINVAL
which is not bad because -ERANGE makes more sense here. The check for
!count is
parse_arg() duplicates the funcionality of kstrtoint() so use the latter
function instead. There is no funcionality change except that in the
case of input being too big -ERANGE will be returned instead of -EINVAL
which is not bad because -ERANGE makes more sense here. The check for
!count is
16 matches
Mail list logo