On 01/04/18 14:21, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:01:41AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>> On 01/04/18 09:31, Ian Kent wrote:
>>> On 31/03/18 10:28, Andrei Vagin wrote:
In "autofs4: use wait_event_killable", wait_event_interruptible() was
replaced by wait_event_killable(), but
On Sun, Apr 01, 2018 at 10:01:41AM +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
> On 01/04/18 09:31, Ian Kent wrote:
> > On 31/03/18 10:28, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> >> In "autofs4: use wait_event_killable", wait_event_interruptible() was
> >> replaced by wait_event_killable(), but in this case we have to use
> >> wake_up(
On 01/04/18 09:31, Ian Kent wrote:
> On 31/03/18 10:28, Andrei Vagin wrote:
>> In "autofs4: use wait_event_killable", wait_event_interruptible() was
>> replaced by wait_event_killable(), but in this case we have to use
>> wake_up() instead of wake_up_interruptible().
>
> Why do you believe wake_u
On 31/03/18 10:28, Andrei Vagin wrote:
> In "autofs4: use wait_event_killable", wait_event_interruptible() was
> replaced by wait_event_killable(), but in this case we have to use
> wake_up() instead of wake_up_interruptible().
Why do you believe wake_up() is needed rather than wake_up_interrupti
In "autofs4: use wait_event_killable", wait_event_interruptible() was
replaced by wait_event_killable(), but in this case we have to use
wake_up() instead of wake_up_interruptible().
Cc: Matthew Wilcox
Cc: Ian Kent
Cc: Andrew Morton
Cc: Stephen Rothwell
Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin
---
fs/au
5 matches
Mail list logo