Hi Jianchao.
jianchao.wang - 17.04.18, 16:34:
> On 04/17/2018 08:10 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > For testing it I add it to 4.16.2 with the patches I have already?
>
> You could try to only apply this patch to have a test. :)
I tested 4.16.3 with just your patch (+ the unrelated btrfs
Hi Jianchao.
jianchao.wang - 17.04.18, 16:34:
> On 04/17/2018 08:10 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > For testing it I add it to 4.16.2 with the patches I have already?
>
> You could try to only apply this patch to have a test. :)
I tested 4.16.3 with just your patch (+ the unrelated btrfs
Hi Jianchao.
jianchao.wang - 17.04.18, 16:34:
> On 04/17/2018 08:10 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > For testing it I add it to 4.16.2 with the patches I have already?
>
> You could try to only apply this patch to have a test.
Compiling now to have a test.
Thanks,
--
Martin
Hi Jianchao.
jianchao.wang - 17.04.18, 16:34:
> On 04/17/2018 08:10 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> > For testing it I add it to 4.16.2 with the patches I have already?
>
> You could try to only apply this patch to have a test.
Compiling now to have a test.
Thanks,
--
Martin
Hi Martin
On 04/17/2018 08:10 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> For testing it I add it to 4.16.2 with the patches I have already?
You could try to only apply this patch to have a test. :)
>
> - '[PATCH] blk-mq_Directly schedule q->timeout_work when aborting a
> request.mbox'
>
> - '[PATCH v2]
Hi Martin
On 04/17/2018 08:10 PM, Martin Steigerwald wrote:
> For testing it I add it to 4.16.2 with the patches I have already?
You could try to only apply this patch to have a test. :)
>
> - '[PATCH] blk-mq_Directly schedule q->timeout_work when aborting a
> request.mbox'
>
> - '[PATCH v2]
Hi Jianchao,
Jianchao Wang - 17.04.18, 05:46:
> rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
> allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
> there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
> be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and
Hi Jianchao,
Jianchao Wang - 17.04.18, 05:46:
> rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
> allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
> there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
> be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:46:20AM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
> allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
> there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
> be rq that has been allocated but not
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 11:46:20AM +0800, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
> allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
> there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
> be rq that has been allocated but not
On 4/16/18 9:46 PM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
> allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
> there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
> be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and
On 4/16/18 9:46 PM, Jianchao Wang wrote:
> rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
> allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
> there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
> be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and
rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and started. At
the moment, the rq->gstate and
rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and started. At
the moment, the rq->gstate and
rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and started. At
the moment, the rq->gstate and
rq->gstate and rq->aborted_gstate both are zero before rqs are
allocated. If we have a small timeout, when the timer fires,
there could be rqs that are never allocated, and also there could
be rq that has been allocated but not initialized and started. At
the moment, the rq->gstate and
16 matches
Mail list logo
