Hello Marc,
On 7/26/19 1:48 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 4/29/19 2:03 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>
>> @@ -744,8 +652,8 @@ static irqreturn_t ti_hecc_interrupt(int irq, void
>> *dev_id)
>> struct net_device *ndev = (struct net_device *)dev_id;
>> struct ti_hecc_priv *priv =
On 4/29/19 2:03 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> As already mentioned in [1] and included in [2], there is an off by one
> issue since the high bank is already enabled when the _next_ mailbox to
> be read has index 12, so the mailbox being read was 13. The message can
> therefore go into mailbox 31 and
On Mon, 2019-04-29 at 12:03 +, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> As already mentioned in [1] and included in [2], there is an off by
> one
> issue since the high bank is already enabled when the _next_ mailbox
> to
> be read has index 12, so the mailbox being read was 13. The message
> can
> therefore
Hello Marc,
On 7/24/19 10:26 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 4/29/19 2:03 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
>> As already mentioned in [1] and included in [2], there is an off by one
>> issue since the high bank is already enabled when the _next_ mailbox to
>> be read has index 12, so the mailbox being
On 4/29/19 2:03 PM, Jeroen Hofstee wrote:
> As already mentioned in [1] and included in [2], there is an off by one
> issue since the high bank is already enabled when the _next_ mailbox to
> be read has index 12, so the mailbox being read was 13. The message can
> therefore go into mailbox 31 and
5 matches
Mail list logo
