Re: [PATCH] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > Hi Jia-Ju Bai, > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > > nice catch! > > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai > > Acked-by: Harald Welte Applied to pcmcia-next. Thanks, Dominik
Re: [PATCH] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 04:12:10PM +0100, Harald Welte wrote: > Hi Jia-Ju Bai, > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. > > nice catch! > > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai > > Acked-by: Harald Welte Applied to pcmcia-next. Thanks, Dominik
Re: [PATCH] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol
Hi Jia-Ju Bai, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. nice catch! > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju BaiAcked-by: Harald Welte -- - Harald Welte http://laforge.gnumonks.org/ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
Re: [PATCH] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol
Hi Jia-Ju Bai, On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:49:57PM +0800, Jia-Ju Bai wrote: > This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. nice catch! > Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai Acked-by: Harald Welte -- - Harald Weltehttp://laforge.gnumonks.org/ "Privacy in residential applications is a desirable marketing option." (ETSI EN 300 175-7 Ch. A6)
[PATCH] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol
set_protocol() is never called in atomic context. The call chains ending up at set_protocol() are: [1] set_protocol() <- monitor_card() [2] set_protocol() <- cmm_ioctl() monitor_card() is only set in setup_timer(), and cmm_ioctl() is only set as ".unlocked_ioctl" in file_operations structure "cm4000_fops". Despite never getting called from atomic context, set_protocol() calls mdelay(10), i.e. busy wait for 10ms. That is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range to avoid busy waiting. This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai--- drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c b/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c index cd53771..56fc671 100644 --- a/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c +++ b/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int set_protocol(struct cm4000_dev *dev, struct ptsreq *ptsreq) DEBUGP(5, dev, "NumRecBytes is valid\n"); break; } - mdelay(10); + usleep_range(1, 11000); } if (i == 100) { DEBUGP(5, dev, "Timeout waiting for NumRecBytes getting " @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int set_protocol(struct cm4000_dev *dev, struct ptsreq *ptsreq) DEBUGP(2, dev, "NumRecBytes = %i\n", num_bytes_read); break; } - mdelay(10); + usleep_range(1, 11000); } /* check whether it is a short PTS reply? */ -- 1.9.1
[PATCH] char: pcmcia: cm4000_cs: Replace mdelay with usleep_range in set_protocol
set_protocol() is never called in atomic context. The call chains ending up at set_protocol() are: [1] set_protocol() <- monitor_card() [2] set_protocol() <- cmm_ioctl() monitor_card() is only set in setup_timer(), and cmm_ioctl() is only set as ".unlocked_ioctl" in file_operations structure "cm4000_fops". Despite never getting called from atomic context, set_protocol() calls mdelay(10), i.e. busy wait for 10ms. That is not necessary and can be replaced with usleep_range to avoid busy waiting. This is found by a static analysis tool named DCNS written by myself. Signed-off-by: Jia-Ju Bai --- drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c b/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c index cd53771..56fc671 100644 --- a/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c +++ b/drivers/char/pcmcia/cm4000_cs.c @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ static int set_protocol(struct cm4000_dev *dev, struct ptsreq *ptsreq) DEBUGP(5, dev, "NumRecBytes is valid\n"); break; } - mdelay(10); + usleep_range(1, 11000); } if (i == 100) { DEBUGP(5, dev, "Timeout waiting for NumRecBytes getting " @@ -546,7 +546,7 @@ static int set_protocol(struct cm4000_dev *dev, struct ptsreq *ptsreq) DEBUGP(2, dev, "NumRecBytes = %i\n", num_bytes_read); break; } - mdelay(10); + usleep_range(1, 11000); } /* check whether it is a short PTS reply? */ -- 1.9.1