On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> comment style for
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 10:14 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> comment style for the file type.
>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:14:29PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> comment style for the file
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 03:14:29PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> comment style for the file
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 15:14 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> comment style for the file type.
On Thu, 2018-02-01 at 15:14 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
> Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
> should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
> comment style for the file type.
Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
comment style for the file type.
Cc: Andy Whitcroft
Cc: Joe Perches
Add SPDX license tag check based on the rules defined in
Documentation/process/license-rules.rst. To summarize, SPDX license tags
should be on the 1st line (or 2nd line in scripts) using the appropriate
comment style for the file type.
Cc: Andy Whitcroft
Cc: Joe Perches
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 12:12 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 12:12 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > >
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > > Add a check warning if
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:39 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> > > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> > > newly added files.
> >
> > If
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 07:47 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> > > newly added files.
> >
> > If this is to be done,
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 10:12 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:10:19PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> > > newly added files.
> >
> > If this
On Thu, 2017-11-09 at 10:12 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:10:19PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> > > newly added files.
> >
> > If this
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
>> newly added files.
>
> If this is to be done, and I think it's not a great idea,
Which part? SPDX
On Wed, Nov 8, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
>> newly added files.
>
> If this is to be done, and I think it's not a great idea,
Which part? SPDX tags or checking
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:10:19PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> > newly added files.
>
> If this is to be done, and I think it's not a great idea,
> there are better ways
On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 06:10:19PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> > newly added files.
>
> If this is to be done, and I think it's not a great idea,
> there are better ways
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> newly added files.
If this is to be done, and I think it's not a great idea,
there are better ways of doing this that emit this warning
on a per-file basis instead of a
On Wed, 2017-11-08 at 19:10 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
> newly added files.
If this is to be done, and I think it's not a great idea,
there are better ways of doing this that emit this warning
on a per-file basis instead of a
Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
newly added files.
Cc: Andy Whitcroft
Cc: Joe Perches
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
I rewrote my previous version to
Add a check warning if SPDX-License-Identifier tags are not used in
newly added files.
Cc: Andy Whitcroft
Cc: Joe Perches
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring
---
I rewrote my previous version to check more than just dts files. It also
now looks for a tag in added files rather
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:45:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> 2017-02-24 0:56 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring :
> > Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> > .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
>
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 05:45:03PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> 2017-02-24 0:56 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring :
> > Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> > .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
> > check looks for
Hi Rob,
2017-02-24 0:56 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring :
> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
> check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
>
Hi Rob,
2017-02-24 0:56 GMT+09:00 Rob Herring :
> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
> check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
> license text
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 12:45 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license
> > > of
> > > .dts{i} and DT
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 12:45 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license
> > > of
> > > .dts{i} and DT header files rather
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
>> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
>> check
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
>> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
>> check looks for GPL, BSD, or
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
> check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
> license text
On Thu, 2017-02-23 at 09:56 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
> .dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
> check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
> license text
Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
.dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
license text which are the commonly used DT licenses.
Signed-off-by: Rob
Add a check for using SPDX-License-Identifier tags to define the license of
.dts{i} and DT header files rather than using free form license text. This
check looks for GPL, BSD, or X11(really incorrectly labeled MIT license)
license text which are the commonly used DT licenses.
Signed-off-by: Rob
36 matches
Mail list logo