Quoting Stephen Boyd (2015-02-02 14:09:43)
> If a clock's clk_ops doesn't have the set_phase op set we should
> return an error from clk_set_phase(). This way clock consumers
> know that when they tried to set a phase it didn't work, as
> opposed to the current behavior where the return value is 0
Quoting Stephen Boyd (2015-02-02 14:09:43)
If a clock's clk_ops doesn't have the set_phase op set we should
return an error from clk_set_phase(). This way clock consumers
know that when they tried to set a phase it didn't work, as
opposed to the current behavior where the return value is 0
If a clock's clk_ops doesn't have the set_phase op set we should
return an error from clk_set_phase(). This way clock consumers
know that when they tried to set a phase it didn't work, as
opposed to the current behavior where the return value is 0
meaning success.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
If a clock's clk_ops doesn't have the set_phase op set we should
return an error from clk_set_phase(). This way clock consumers
know that when they tried to set a phase it didn't work, as
opposed to the current behavior where the return value is 0
meaning success.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
4 matches
Mail list logo
