Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-02-06 06:13:01)
> We don't really need to recalculate the effective rate of a clock when a
> per-user clock is removed, if the constraints of the later aren't
> limiting the requested rate.
>
> This was causing problems with clocks that never had a rate set before,
> as
Quoting Tomeu Vizoso (2015-02-06 06:13:01)
We don't really need to recalculate the effective rate of a clock when a
per-user clock is removed, if the constraints of the later aren't
limiting the requested rate.
This was causing problems with clocks that never had a rate set before,
as
We don't really need to recalculate the effective rate of a clock when a
per-user clock is removed, if the constraints of the later aren't
limiting the requested rate.
This was causing problems with clocks that never had a rate set before,
as rate_req would be zero. Though this could be
We don't really need to recalculate the effective rate of a clock when a
per-user clock is removed, if the constraints of the later aren't
limiting the requested rate.
This was causing problems with clocks that never had a rate set before,
as rate_req would be zero. Though this could be
4 matches
Mail list logo