Hi Sylwester,
Le 27/03/2014 11:01, Sylwester Nawrocki a écrit :
Hi Boris,
On 27/03/14 08:58, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
This solution solve the problem for this specific case because clks are
declared in the correct order in imx DTs.
But, even with your patch I think we could see similar issues
Mike, please ignore this patch for now. It turns out a less intrusive
change [1] is enough to fix the regressions on both imx and exynos.
I'm going to address the issue properly for next kernel release and
make exynos use regular fixed-clock driver, rather than registering
the external clock
Hi Boris,
On 27/03/14 08:58, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
> This solution solve the problem for this specific case because clks are
> declared in the correct order in imx DTs.
> But, even with your patch I think we could see similar issues by
> reordering DT nodes...
>
> The real problem here is that
Le 26/03/2014 21:14, Fabio Estevam a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
Perhaps a change as below helps ?
From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylwester Nawrocki
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:54:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH]
Le 26/03/2014 21:14, Fabio Estevam a écrit :
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a change as below helps ?
From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com
Date:
Hi Boris,
On 27/03/14 08:58, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
This solution solve the problem for this specific case because clks are
declared in the correct order in imx DTs.
But, even with your patch I think we could see similar issues by
reordering DT nodes...
The real problem here is that imx
Mike, please ignore this patch for now. It turns out a less intrusive
change [1] is enough to fix the regressions on both imx and exynos.
I'm going to address the issue properly for next kernel release and
make exynos use regular fixed-clock driver, rather than registering
the external clock
Hi Sylwester,
Le 27/03/2014 11:01, Sylwester Nawrocki a écrit :
Hi Boris,
On 27/03/14 08:58, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
This solution solve the problem for this specific case because clks are
declared in the correct order in imx DTs.
But, even with your patch I think we could see similar issues
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
wrote:
> However, Fabio, could you apply the following patch without the patch
> "clk: reverse default clk provider initialization order in
> of_clk_init()" and then sent me the traces. I would like to be sure
> that there is not any side effect.
On 26/03/2014 21:14, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
> wrote:
>
>> Perhaps a change as below helps ?
>>
>> From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Sylwester Nawrocki
>> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:54:13 +0100
>>
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
> Perhaps a change as below helps ?
>
> From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Sylwester Nawrocki
> Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:54:13 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] clk: reverse default clk provider
Hi Fabio,
On 03/26/2014 07:33 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
[...]
Still not able to boot with this patch applied:
Perhaps a change as below helps ?
From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylwester
Hi Sylwester,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
wrote:
> After commit 1771b10d605d26ccee771a7fb4b08718c124097a
> "clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init"
> the order of registering clock providers and their corresponding
> clocks may change. This commit currently
After commit 1771b10d605d26ccee771a7fb4b08718c124097a
"clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init"
the order of registering clock providers and their corresponding
clocks may change. This commit currently causes a regression
on Exynos4 platforms, where fixed clocks are now being registered
After commit 1771b10d605d26ccee771a7fb4b08718c124097a
clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init
the order of registering clock providers and their corresponding
clocks may change. This commit currently causes a regression
on Exynos4 platforms, where fixed clocks are now being registered
Hi Sylwester,
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
s.nawro...@samsung.com wrote:
After commit 1771b10d605d26ccee771a7fb4b08718c124097a
clk: respect the clock dependencies in of_clk_init
the order of registering clock providers and their corresponding
clocks may change. This
Hi Fabio,
On 03/26/2014 07:33 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 3:22 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
s.nawro...@samsung.com wrote:
[...]
Still not able to boot with this patch applied:
Perhaps a change as below helps ?
From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a change as below helps ?
From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com
Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2014 20:54:13 +0100
Subject:
On 26/03/2014 21:14, Fabio Estevam wrote:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Sylwester Nawrocki
sylvester.nawro...@gmail.com wrote:
Perhaps a change as below helps ?
From 85ee85e4a92b42442354f3f2454be50c173e1c59 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Sylwester Nawrocki s.nawro...@samsung.com
Date:
On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 5:25 PM, Gregory CLEMENT
gregory.clem...@free-electrons.com wrote:
However, Fabio, could you apply the following patch without the patch
clk: reverse default clk provider initialization order in
of_clk_init() and then sent me the traces. I would like to be sure
that
20 matches
Mail list logo
