Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-20 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:10:54PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver > > and the other one is not, CCF will think

Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-20 Thread Peter De Schrijver
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 02:27:46PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:10:54PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > > In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver > > and the other one is not, CCF will think

Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:10:54PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver > and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only > look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also >

Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 04:10:54PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver > and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only > look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also >

Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:22:05PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver > and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only > look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also >

Re: [PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-20 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 03:22:05PM +0200, Peter De Schrijver wrote: > In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver > and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only > look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also >

[PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-15 Thread Peter De Schrijver
In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also disable the other clock which was enabled. Solve this by reading the initial

[PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-15 Thread Peter De Schrijver
In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also disable the other clock which was enabled. Solve this by reading the initial

[PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-02 Thread Peter De Schrijver
In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also disable the other clock which was enabled. Solve this by reading the initial

[PATCH] clk: tegra: fix disable unused for clocks sharing enable bit

2017-03-02 Thread Peter De Schrijver
In case 2 clocks share an enable bit and one of them is enabled by a driver and the other one is not, CCF will think it's enabled because it will only look at the hw state. Therefor it will disable the clock and thus also disable the other clock which was enabled. Solve this by reading the initial