On 07/31/2014 01:42 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-07-30 05:27:07)
On 07/30/2014 08:53 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv
On 07/31/2014 01:42 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-07-30 05:27:07)
On 07/30/2014 08:53 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv
Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-07-30 05:27:07)
> On 07/30/2014 08:53 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> >>> Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
> >>> this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv if you like.
> >>
> >> That is
On 07/30/2014 08:53 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv if you like.
That is the easiest thing for me. I think that Peter wanted to take
this
On 07/30/2014 08:53 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv if you like.
That is the easiest thing for me. I think that Peter wanted to take
this
Quoting Tero Kristo (2014-07-30 05:27:07)
On 07/30/2014 08:53 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv if you like.
That is the easiest thing
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>> Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
>> this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv if you like.
>
> That is the easiest thing for me. I think that Peter wanted to take
> this as a fix for 3.16 though. Peter is that
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 07/29/2014 09:27 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
>>
>> Quoting Peter Ujfalusi (2014-07-14 03:10:28)
>>>
>>> On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>
>> Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further
>>
On 07/29/2014 09:27 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Peter Ujfalusi (2014-07-14 03:10:28)
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?
Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on getting
Quoting Peter Ujfalusi (2014-07-14 03:10:28)
> On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> >>> Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?
> >>
> >> Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on
> >> getting
> >> default rate/parent support
Quoting Peter Ujfalusi (2014-07-14 03:10:28)
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?
Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on
getting
default rate/parent support through DT. I
On 07/29/2014 09:27 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Peter Ujfalusi (2014-07-14 03:10:28)
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?
Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on getting
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 1:23 AM, Tero Kristo t-kri...@ti.com wrote:
On 07/29/2014 09:27 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Quoting Peter Ujfalusi (2014-07-14 03:10:28)
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further
concerns?
Yea
On 07/29/2014 07:12 PM, Mike Turquette wrote:
Oh yea, seems this got lost into the myriad of branches I have. I can push
this on top of my for-v3.17/ti-clk-drv if you like.
That is the easiest thing for me. I think that Peter wanted to take
this as a fix for 3.16 though. Peter is that
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?
>>
>> Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on getting
>> default rate/parent support through DT. I would like a comment from Mike
>> about
>>
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Tero: can I have your ack for this patch or do you have further concerns?
Yea looks good to me, except for the fact that there is some work on getting
default rate/parent support through DT. I would like a comment from Mike
about
the estimate
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike,
On 04/24/2014 06:03 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike,
On 04/24/2014 06:03 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike,
On 04/24/2014 06:03 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> Mike, Tero,
>>
>> On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> ABE DPLL frequency need to be
Mike,
On 04/24/2014 06:03 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from
On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
>> On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>>> ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
>>> to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
>>> The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set
On 04/24/2014 12:11 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
Mike, Tero,
On 04/03/2014 09:29 AM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
> On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>> ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
>> to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
>> The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
>> of ABE DPLL rate in order to have
On 04/02/2014 05:12 PM, Tero Kristo wrote:
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
of ABE DPLL rate in order to have correct clocks
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
of ABE DPLL rate in order to have correct clocks
for audio.
Do you have some sort of TRM
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
of ABE DPLL rate in order to have correct clocks
for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi
---
drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c | 7 ++-
1 file
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
of ABE DPLL rate in order to have correct clocks
for audio.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfal...@ti.com
---
drivers/clk/ti/clk-7xx.c
On 04/02/2014 04:48 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
ABE DPLL frequency need to be lowered from 361267200
to 180633600 to facilitate the ATL requironments.
The dpll_abe_m2x2_ck clock need to be set to double
of ABE DPLL rate in order to have correct clocks
for audio.
Do you have some sort of TRM
30 matches
Mail list logo
