On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:54:17PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
> >compat_sys_mq_notify()
> >2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
> >sigevent. compat
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 04:54:17PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native
On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of
On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of
On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of
On 2/14/2015 6:22 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
1. user populates sival_int compat_sigevent and invokes
compat_sys_mq_notify()
2. kernel get_compat_sigevent() copies compat_sigevent into the native
sigevent. compat and native sival_int are the same, no problem so
far. The other half of
On 2015/2/13 18:44, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
>> On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10,
On 2015/2/14 19:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
>> On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
On 2015/2/14 19:22, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
On 2015/2/13 18:44, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
> On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
> >>index e299de396e9b..32601939a3c8
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:56:29PM -0500, Chris Metcalf wrote:
On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/signal32.c
index e299de396e9b..32601939a3c8 100644
---
On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> >> On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor)
On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
>> On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
...
> The native sigval_t is also a union but on 64-bit big endian,
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
...
The native sigval_t is also a union but on 64-bit big endian, the
On 2/13/2015 5:44 AM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 04:00:43PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/11 23:40, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
> On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
> >> In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
> >> big endian kernel compare with low
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> cc'ing linux-arch as well.
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
>> In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
>> big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of sigval_ptr in little
>> endian
On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 07:22:08PM +0800, Bamvor Jian Zhang wrote:
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of
On 2015/2/10 20:27, Catalin Marinas wrote:
cc'ing linux-arch as well.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of sigval_ptr in little
endian kernel.
cc'ing linux-arch as well.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
> In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
> big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of sigval_ptr in little
> endian kernel. reference:
>
> typedef union sigval {
>
In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of sigval_ptr in little
endian kernel. reference:
typedef union sigval {
int sival_int;
void *sival_ptr;
} sigval_t;
During compat_mq_notify or
In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of sigval_ptr in little
endian kernel. reference:
typedef union sigval {
int sival_int;
void *sival_ptr;
} sigval_t;
During compat_mq_notify or
cc'ing linux-arch as well.
On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 10:10:11AM +, Zhang Jian(Bamvor) wrote:
In 64bit architecture, sigval_int is the high 32bit of sigval_ptr in
big endian kernel compare with low 32bit of sigval_ptr in little
endian kernel. reference:
typedef union sigval {
26 matches
Mail list logo