Re: [PATCH] cpu: Bool tests don't need comparisons
* Wen Yang wrote: > This is the patch to the file cpu.c > which fixes the following coccinelle warning: > > WARNING: Comparison to bool > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang > CC: Thomas Gleixner > CC: Ingo Molnar > CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > CC: Josh Poimboeuf > CC: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" > CC: Peter Zijlstra > CC: Mukesh Ojha > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c > index 91d5c38eb7e5..5bdd7e150a11 100644 > --- a/kernel/cpu.c > +++ b/kernel/cpu.c > @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ int __cpuhp_state_add_instance_cpuslocked(enum > cpuhp_state state, > lockdep_assert_cpus_held(); > > sp = cpuhp_get_step(state); > - if (sp->multi_instance == false) > + if (!sp->multi_instance) > return -EINVAL; > This is a *totally* bogus explanation. This is an equivalent pattern to '== 0' which is commonly used. The patch is still doing the right thing, but only accidentally, for another reason, it's because we are using ->multi_instance in an inconsistent fashion: kernel/cpu.c: if (!step->multi_instance) { kernel/cpu.c: if (sp->multi_instance == false) kernel/cpu.c: if (!sp->multi_instance) kernel/cpu.c: if (sp->multi_instance) { But that's really just by accident - if all usages were of the '== true/false' pattern then this wouldn't be necessary. Thanks, Ingo
Re: [PATCH] cpu: Bool tests don't need comparisons
* Wen Yang wrote: > This is the patch to the file cpu.c > which fixes the following coccinelle warning: > > WARNING: Comparison to bool > > Signed-off-by: Wen Yang > CC: Thomas Gleixner > CC: Ingo Molnar > CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > CC: Josh Poimboeuf > CC: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" > CC: Peter Zijlstra > CC: Mukesh Ojha > CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > --- > kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c > index 91d5c38eb7e5..5bdd7e150a11 100644 > --- a/kernel/cpu.c > +++ b/kernel/cpu.c > @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ int __cpuhp_state_add_instance_cpuslocked(enum > cpuhp_state state, > lockdep_assert_cpus_held(); > > sp = cpuhp_get_step(state); > - if (sp->multi_instance == false) > + if (!sp->multi_instance) > return -EINVAL; > This is a *totally* bogus explanation. This is an equivalent pattern to '== 0' which is commonly used. The patch is still doing the right thing, but only accidentally, for another reason, it's because we are using ->multi_instance in an inconsistent fashion: kernel/cpu.c: if (!step->multi_instance) { kernel/cpu.c: if (sp->multi_instance == false) kernel/cpu.c: if (!sp->multi_instance) kernel/cpu.c: if (sp->multi_instance) { But that's really just by accident - if all usages were of the '== true/false' pattern then this wouldn't be necessary. Thanks, Ingo
[PATCH] cpu: Bool tests don't need comparisons
This is the patch to the file cpu.c which fixes the following coccinelle warning: WARNING: Comparison to bool Signed-off-by: Wen Yang CC: Thomas Gleixner CC: Ingo Molnar CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Josh Poimboeuf CC: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" CC: Peter Zijlstra CC: Mukesh Ojha CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 91d5c38eb7e5..5bdd7e150a11 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ int __cpuhp_state_add_instance_cpuslocked(enum cpuhp_state state, lockdep_assert_cpus_held(); sp = cpuhp_get_step(state); - if (sp->multi_instance == false) + if (!sp->multi_instance) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(_state_mutex); -- 2.19.1
[PATCH] cpu: Bool tests don't need comparisons
This is the patch to the file cpu.c which fixes the following coccinelle warning: WARNING: Comparison to bool Signed-off-by: Wen Yang CC: Thomas Gleixner CC: Ingo Molnar CC: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk CC: Josh Poimboeuf CC: "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" CC: Peter Zijlstra CC: Mukesh Ojha CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --- kernel/cpu.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/cpu.c b/kernel/cpu.c index 91d5c38eb7e5..5bdd7e150a11 100644 --- a/kernel/cpu.c +++ b/kernel/cpu.c @@ -1650,7 +1650,7 @@ int __cpuhp_state_add_instance_cpuslocked(enum cpuhp_state state, lockdep_assert_cpus_held(); sp = cpuhp_get_step(state); - if (sp->multi_instance == false) + if (!sp->multi_instance) return -EINVAL; mutex_lock(_state_mutex); -- 2.19.1