Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Set CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION for drivers handling notification

2014-04-25 Thread Srivatsa S. Bhat
On 04/25/2014 01:22 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote: > CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION was initially designed for drivers which don't want > core to send notifications for them as they wouldn't finish frequency > transitions in ->target_index(). > And let's keep it that way. Overloading ASYNC_NOTIFICATION with

[PATCH] cpufreq: Set CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION for drivers handling notification

2014-04-25 Thread Viresh Kumar
CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION was initially designed for drivers which don't want core to send notifications for them as they wouldn't finish frequency transitions in ->target_index(). But there were other kinds of drivers as well who don't have straight forward implementations of ->target_index() ro