On 09.02.2015 10:47, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 02/09/2015 10:35 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:13P -0500,
> >Mike Snitzer wrote:
> >
> >Jens and I discussed this further and given that linux-block breaks
> >dm-multipath it is best to fix linux-block and let Linus resolve the
>
On 09.02.2015 10:47, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 02/09/2015 10:35 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:13P -0500,
Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
Jens and I discussed this further and given that linux-block breaks
dm-multipath it is best to fix linux-block and let Linus resolve
On 02/09/2015 10:35 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:13P -0500,
Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:07pm -0500,
Keith Busch wrote:
Oh, we're not going rebase the series with the correction? I'm concerned
someone biscecting a completely unrelated problem might
eb 2015 12:21:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix multipath regression due to initializing wrong request
Commit febf715 ("block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an
initialized clone request") introduced a regression by calling
blk_rq_init() on the original request rather than the clone
On 02/09/2015 10:35 AM, Mike Snitzer wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:13P -0500,
Mike Snitzer snit...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Feb 09 2015 at 12:07pm -0500,
Keith Busch keith.bu...@intel.com wrote:
Oh, we're not going rebase the series with the correction? I'm concerned
someone biscecting a
Feb 2015 12:21:54 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] dm: fix multipath regression due to initializing wrong request
Commit febf715 (block: require blk_rq_prep_clone() be given an
initialized clone request) introduced a regression by calling
blk_rq_init() on the original request rather than the clone
request
6 matches
Mail list logo
