Re: [PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent)

2008-02-11 Thread Jean Delvare
Hi Parag, On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:35:39 -0500, Parag Warudkar wrote: > On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [Once more without forgetting the last "quilt refresh", sorry.] > > > > Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed > > to break

Re: [PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent)

2008-02-11 Thread Parag Warudkar
On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [Once more without forgetting the last "quilt refresh", sorry.] > > Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed > to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan > since commit

[PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent)

2008-02-11 Thread Jean Delvare
[Once more without forgetting the last "quilt refresh", sorry.] Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan since commit 79da4721117fcf188b4b007b775738a530f574da. Given that there is absolutely no

Re: [PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent)

2008-02-11 Thread Parag Warudkar
On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [Once more without forgetting the last quilt refresh, sorry.] Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan since commit

[PATCH] dmi: Prevent linked list corruption (resent)

2008-02-11 Thread Jean Delvare
[Once more without forgetting the last quilt refresh, sorry.] Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan since commit 79da4721117fcf188b4b007b775738a530f574da. Given that there is absolutely no