Hi Parag,
On Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:35:39 -0500, Parag Warudkar wrote:
> On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [Once more without forgetting the last "quilt refresh", sorry.]
> >
> > Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed
> > to break
On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [Once more without forgetting the last "quilt refresh", sorry.]
>
> Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed
> to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan
> since commit
[Once more without forgetting the last "quilt refresh", sorry.]
Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed
to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan
since commit 79da4721117fcf188b4b007b775738a530f574da.
Given that there is absolutely no
On Feb 11, 2008 12:24 PM, Jean Delvare [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Once more without forgetting the last quilt refresh, sorry.]
Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed
to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan
since commit
[Once more without forgetting the last quilt refresh, sorry.]
Adding the same item to a given linked list more than once is guaranteed
to break and corrupt the list. This is however what we do in dmi_scan
since commit 79da4721117fcf188b4b007b775738a530f574da.
Given that there is absolutely no
5 matches
Mail list logo