On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> Could you please adjust in this way? Again, the point is to be the
> first few items in a full set of permutations, not to illustrate selected
> orderings/outcomes.
>
OK, if that is the case then replacing x with y is much easier. I
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:45:10PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> >> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > I am really confused by
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:45:10PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:08 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
Could you please adjust in this way? Again, the point is to be the
first few items in a full set of permutations, not to illustrate selected
orderings/outcomes.
OK, if that is the case then replacing x with
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I would have
>> > expected the "x"s to be
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
> wrote:
> >
> > I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I would have
> > expected the "x"s to be replaced with "y"s and vice versa. But the
> > ordering of the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
wrote:
>
> I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I would have
> expected the "x"s to be replaced with "y"s and vice versa. But the
> ordering of the various combinations does not matter, and each line
> looks OK.
>
Since x =
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I would have
expected the xs to be replaced with ys and vice versa. But the
ordering of the various combinations does not matter, and each line
looks
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I would have
expected the xs to be replaced with ys and vice versa. But the
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:39 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 05:15:50PM -0400, Pranith Kumar wrote:
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 5:00 PM, Paul E. McKenney
paul...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
I am really confused by the ordering of the new lines, as I
Correct the example of memory orderings in memory-barriers.txt
Commit 615cc2c9cf95 "Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: fix important typo re
memory barriers" changed the assignment to x and y. Change the rest of the
example to match this change.
Reported-by: Ganesh Rapolu
Signed-off-by: Pranith
Correct the example of memory orderings in memory-barriers.txt
Commit 615cc2c9cf95 Documentation/memory-barriers.txt: fix important typo re
memory barriers changed the assignment to x and y. Change the rest of the
example to match this change.
Reported-by: Ganesh Rapolu ganesh.rap...@hotmail.com
12 matches
Mail list logo
